1802

Parenago 1802, a member of the ∼1 Myr Orion Nebula Cluster, is a double-lined, detached eclipsing binary in a 4.674 d orbit, with equal-mass components (M2/M1=0.985±0.029). Here we present extensive V IC JHKS light curves spanning ∼15 yr, as well as a Keck/HIRES optical spectrum. The light curves evince a third light source that is variable with a period of 0.73 d, and is also manifested in the high-resolution spectrum, strongly indicating the presence of a third star in the system, probably a rapidly

London is the capital if England. With the changes of history and times, and the vicissitudes of the world, this old-line and beautiful city has formed the humanistic spirit with national characteristics. After reading the two Williams’ works, I couldn’t hold back my curiosity about the differences in their poems. Although Black and Wordsworth are all important representatives of romantic poets, their writing styles and points of view vary so much. How could London vary so much in two productions

“London, 1802” dramatizes the conflict between how England is now, and how it used to be. The speaker expresses concern for England’s present state when they say,” Milton! Thou should’st be living at this hour: / England hath need of thee” (1-2). This shows that the speaker feels sympathy for England’s current condition. The speaker then on to say that the cause of England’s current condition are its citizens; the speaker describes England’s citizens as “selfish men” (6) who need “manners, virtue

London, 1802 I wake up and think I am in our old house in the countryside. The sun is streaming through the window from rolling, green hills outside, and I can smell my mother’s cooking wafting through the house. Soon the day will begin, a long day, of weaving cloth. This is not true, but it is how it used to be. When the machines came, we could no longer keep up with the demands for cloth. We were forced to move to the city and work in a factory, where we tend machines all day long until the

rhythm of lines, I’ve chosen “London, 1802” by William Wordsworth and “Chicago” by Carl Sandburg. In “London, 1802,” poem that was published for the first time in 1807, Wordsworth formed his sonnet with a rhyme pattern that was written in the second person. In “Chicago” poem that was published in 1916, Sandburg admired others through his humorous use of language, unique use of grammar and his interest in poem shape. The style and the language of “London, 1802,” show how Wordsworth extended the range

Similar in theme to Wordsworth’s “London, 1802” is Percy Shelley’s poem “England in 1819”. Looking at Shelley’s poem in terms of historical context and nostalgia allows the political sonnet to be read as a piece of restorative nostalgia for the targeted reading audience of this works time period. This sonnet is written in iambic pentameter however the rhyme scheme of this sonnet differs from the scheme of a traditional English sonnet. The rhyme scheme within this poem follows ABABAB,CDCD,CCDD. Connecting

Poem Questions London, 1802 1.) The speaker’s tone in this poem is expressed as one of anger or frustration. In the very being, the speaker cries out “Milton!” and asks for help from the dead poet. The speaker proclaims that England is a “fen of stagnant waters,” and is made of “selfish men.” He is so desperate that he asks the dead poet to “raise [them] up” and to give them “manners.” It is made clear the speaker is unhappy and frustrated with the state of England. 2.) In lines three through six

The Time Person of the Year for 1802 needs to be someone caring, brave, and resilient and Martha Custis Washington fits that description perfectly. When I say Martha Washington I bet most of you are thinking of her as George Washington’s wife or the first lady but there is much more to her than just that. She has many different aspects that would make her perfect for the job of 1802’s woman of the year. The first reason Marha should be Person of the Year is she was very caring. When George was fighting

at first glance turn out to be more similar after a second look. This is the case for the poems London, 1802 by William Wordsworth, and Douglass by Paul Laurence Dunbar. The major differences in these poems combine with the similarities to show the timeless need for revolutionary authors. When reading these poems, several differences are obvious immediately. London, 1802 was written in 1802, while Douglass was written about one-hundred years later. This time difference is important because it shows

English Lit and Comp, 2 26 October 2012 “London 1802” vs. “Douglass” FRQ Throughout the centuries, there have been an infinite amount of literary works written by a sea of authors that write a variety of genres. All of these works are precious in their own way, and even if their theme is similar to that of another, the author always ads a bit of his/her own flare in order to make said literary creation unique in some way. William Wordsworth’s “London 1802” and Paul Laurence Dunbar’s “Douglass”, although