Antitrust Case Essay

A Review of the Literature on “Pay-for-Play” in Intercollegiate Athletics by Sara J. Singleton EDU 7253 Legal Environment of Higher Education June 21, 2015 Abstract In light of recent court cases such as O’Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the issue of whether intercollegiate student-athletes should be compensated for their athletic appearances on behalf of colleges has been featured in the news and been the subject of much scholarly writing. Some of the major streams

advance to the point it is at today. The main steps that were taken in this advancement include the development of technology, the development of the Sports Broadcasting Act, and most importantly the progression of case law involving sports broadcasting rights through the reviewing of many cases. In order to be able to grasp how sports broadcasting rights became how

the merger, and rumors of an antitrust review were imminent (Popelka). "This is a great example of how U.S. antitrust policy has turned into a political game"( Popelka). Politicians may gain supporters, but no one is going to decrease the cost of cable service to consumers (Popelka). Antitrust laws were put into place for a reason. "The Sherman Antitrust Act was created to prevent monopolistic activities that diminish consumer choice or competition" (Popelka). In this case, the merger between these

A. Collectively there are four major pieces of legislation that make us the Antitrust Laws: The Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act of 1914, the Federal Trade Commission act of 1914 and the Celler- Kefauver Act of 1950. The purpose of these acts and laws is to regulate trade and commerce by preventing unlawful restrictions, price fixing and monopolies; their goal is to promote competition and to encourage the production of quality goods and services at reasonable prices while safeguarding the

international corporations. There has been an unmistakable trend toward bigness in business since the mid-1980s. Corporate mergers are now very common and undoubtable effective. The US government regulates these businesses through antitrust laws. Corporate mergers and antitrust laws play a crucial role for producers and consumers. The historical backdrop of the American economy since the Civil War has become a corporate focus. A business game changer arrived at in the early

to have a meeting for legitimate business, unlawful price fixing may be the reason. (McDavid) The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1980 was the first measure passed by the United States Congress to prohibit trusts. Included in the act were terms such as restraint of trade, concerted action, market allocations, boycotts, monopolies, tying arrangements, and price fixing. (McDavid) The Sherman Antitrust Act states that agreements to obstruct “price competition by raising, depressing, fixing, or stabilizing prices

Introduction: On January 12, 2010 the National Football League (NFL) went before the Supreme Court seeking immunity under the antitrust laws. The Court had a seemingly easy question presented to them. When the NFL and its thirty-two franchises get together and make business decisions like intellectual property licensing, are they a group of competitors subject to the antitrust laws, or are they more like a board of directors incapable of illegally conspiring with themselves. Writing for a unanimous

split between the structuralists and the behavioralists on the antitrust policies. The structuralists believed that any firm with a high market

A Review of the Literature on “Pay for Play” in College Athletics by Sara J. Singleton EDU 7253 Legal Environment of Higher Education May 28, 2015 Abstract Because of recent court cases such as O’Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the issue of whether intercollegiate student-athletes should be compensated for their athletic appearances on behalf of colleges has been featured in the news and been the subject of much scholarly writing. This literature review will focus

SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT I claim that the Sherman Antitrust Act is a critical and necessary statute that gradually caused significant changes in business practices in order to ensure a competitive free market system essential for long term growth of the economy, although it faced criticisms for sacrificing economic efficiency. This fundamental statute continues to notably shape the economic landscape even today, albeit being more than 100 years old. The act contains three sections. The first section