Apology Essay

I am not so certain if Socrates' approach to his defense is particularly the brightest one, and it certainly is not an apology as the title has named it, but, there is a certain wisdom in the simple, plain structured arguments he presents. One of the first things he mentions, is for the jury to pardon him, in the case that he should slip into his accustomed way of speaking, just as they would pardon a foreigner for speaking in his accustomed manner. This appears to me to be a wise idea, as it is

Some of the best sources of information about Socrates' philosophical views are the early dialogues of his student Plato, who tried to provide a faithful picture of the methods and teachings of the great master. The Apology is one of the many-recorded dialogues about Socrates. It is about how Socrates was arrested and charged with corrupting the youth, believing in no god(s) (Atheism) and for being a Sophist. He attended his trial and put up a good argument. I believe that Socrates was wrongfully

In “The Apology” by Plato, Socrates defends himself against the jury, having no fear to the death. In his statement, he has two important claims: the unexamined life and the excellence of human soul. Socrates states that “the unexamined life is not worth living”, which means that the life without inquiry is incomplete. He mentions that he is accused of being examining others and proving their ignorance. He talks about that people live in the unexamined life, For example, Socrates comes to the politician

government’s attempt to make several apologies is thoughtful; however, simply uttering the words, “I’m sorry” cannot undue the trauma of the past. The apology is more for the people giving them, rather than for the actual victim. As Stephan Harper apologized for Canada’s colonial past, he said: “it is the core of Canadian soul” (Miyagawa 2012). This simply portrays that the government is apologizing because it is “Canadian” of them to do so. This is a limitation of an apology as it creates an “overly-celebratory

I believe that an apology does not have the power to set someone free. Especially Harper's apology. An apology is just words and it doesn’t mean anything, the real power is making a change and fixing the problem. An apology may be able to bring hope but, never set anyone free. In the text, he states that the apology is his alone, but it’s not. Most Politicians have their speeches written for them, his apology is not meaningful when it comes from someone else. Furthermore, he mentions his team

Socrates, the protagonist of The Apology believes he is providing wisdom to the city of Athens, which is his service to God. Though, very simple, Socrates professes his own ignorance to the jury through out his “apology”. What is quite interesting about his wisdom is the fact that he does not know what he does not know. Furthermore, Socrates believes that he is the greatest philosopher of all time and therefore, must never stop philosophizing. In relation, Socrates goes on and on about virtue and

The Apology In this court trial Socrates attempts to be his own attorney, Socrates was sentenced to death due to his extravagant claims about his wisdom. Plato names his defense “The Apology”. Now the definition of and apology is “a written or spoken expression of one's regret, remorse, or sorrow for having insulted, failed, injured, or wronged another”. Socrates defense or speech was not an apology at all; it was the total opposite. Socrates claims his good friend Chaerephon talked to the goddess

Plato’s Apology is a monologue of the speech that Socrates made when he was put on trial for natural philosophy, corrupting the youth and impiety. What is ironic about this is that the dialogue is entitled apology but what we expect is that an individual in sorry and admitting that they are at fault, that they are in the wrong, when Socrates is doing the complete opposite. The entire dialogue consists of him defending his beliefs and his actions; it is basically him defending who he is as a person

saying, “Apologies are the only way to cleanse the past.” There is controversy surrounding whether this quotation can be taken as truth or fiction. Government apologies have become a very common staple in Canadian society, and in my opinion, have been drained of their meaning. Mulroney’s statement is simply not reflective of the values and beliefs of majority of Canadians. Words cannot and will not accurately heal and reconcile all affected parties. Brian Mulroney implies that apologies are the only

1. In “Apology,” Socrates compares himself to a gadfly. Why is it that Socrates does this? a. As a defense in his trial b. To make a point c. Plato pointed it out to him and Socrates thought it would be a good idea to explain to the court how he was one as a defense d. To show the crowd how his accusers were correct e. To try to confuse the court 2. In the reading, “Apology” there are several things that Socrates is accused of. Which of the following is Socrates not accused of? a. Not believing