Cognitive Dissonance Essay

The cognitive dissonance theory specifies that inconsistencies in an individual’s thoughts and actions lead to mental tension, dissonance, and cause us to take actions to reduce this dissonance. Actions include either changing the way you think about something or the way you action. The amount of dissonance can vary depending on justification; an unjustifiable causes more dissonance in comparison to acting with a good enough reason, depends how the individual’s morals. In Festinger and Carlsmith’s

all the more indicative of the nation avoiding cognitive dissonance. The Obama administration has tried to avoid the regional battle in the Middle East where Iran is poised to become a central player. So the US surreptitiously supports Iran in fighting the common enemy in Isis while also working to contain Iran’s efforts to expand their influence in the area that seems contradictory. What the situation

watching it. Both the Omens and Cognitive Dissonance share the similar genre of thriller. They are placed in this genre due to both having intense situations and having the characters hold its audience in suspense. The Omens, written by Mateo Lara and directed by DeNae Brown, keeps the audience wondering in suspense what will happen to the characters when they are confronted with the negative foreshadowing’s of their sick friend. On the other hand, Cognitive Dissonance, written by Chyna Parker and directed

that our attitudes have a relationship with our behaviour (Cognitive dissonance). While other believed that such relationship do not exist Self-perception theory. This essay will aim to discuss if attitudes and behaviour have any relationship. The essay will begin by explaining how attitudes as a social phenomenon are formed, then it will then go on to make

Cognitive dissonance occurs when a person is in a state of tension when they hold two cognitions being (ideas, attitudes, beliefs, and opinions.) Dissonance produces a sort of discomfort that ranges from deep anguish to not sleeping at night, until a solution is found (Aboriginal). The policies that are put in to place for safety, are often turned in to a discriminatory act. Examples of discriminatory practices that often occur in our society and communities are (gender discrimination, race & ethnicity

“like” oneself in order to prevent dissonance from inconsistent things. “A fear of dissonance would lead to a reluctance to take action—a reluctance to commit oneself” (Festinger 31). The second, post decision dissonance, occurs after a difficult decision and creates a need for reassurance. The importance, difficulty, and irreversibility of the decision increase the dissonance. Therefore, individuals seek reassuring information or people to reduce their inner dissonance. Lastly, minimal justification

feelings of inadequacy by projecting them onto a target group, such as using them as scapegoats. The Jewish police in the Pianist does this, where they have cognitive dissonance. As well in Crash, Officer John Ryan discriminates the black community more severely because he was not able to get any welfare money for his father. Cognitive dissonance can create more discriminatory actions such as fighting, which happens in Pleasantville, where the grey teenagers beat buds mother, since she is one of the

During Africa's colonialism, opinions on the opposite race were easily influenced and constantly changed. Cognitive dissonance is the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes. Things Fall Apart shows cognitive dissonance relating to one person. Shooting an Elephant and Heart of Darkness, both show a much larger view of cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance especially relates to behavioral decisions and attitude change. Both Europeans and Africans, made decisions that ended

things happen to bad people, the belief in a just world. Social psychologists have studied ways to remove the hypocrisy effect while maintaining people’s self-esteem. The research design often used is a hypocrisy induction where researchers arouse dissonance in participants by having them make statements that are contrary to their behaviors and them reminding the participants of the inconsistency between their behavior and what they have advocated for. The goal of hypocrisy induction is for individuals

Emotion Attribution Theory According to Schachter and Singer (1962), emotion attribution theory is based on two factors of emotions: physiological arousal and cognitive label. The two-factor theory of emotion focuses on the interaction between physical arousal and how we cognitively label that arousal. In their view, 'being away from home' and physical arousal may be interpreted as 'homesickness'. The physical arousal is the physical feeling for homesickness such as difficulty sleeping, loss of concentration