Consequentialism Essay

Consequentialism is the moral theory that the morality of an action is to be judged solely by its consequences. Although this definition is relatively specific, it covers a broad range of philosophies. For the context of this paper we will focus on the concept of utilitarianism as it has been emphasized in lecture. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism related to the maximization of utility; looking to maximize the good, while minimizing the bad. While utilitarianism seems to promote overall

In this reading “A Critique of Utilitarianism,” Bernard Williams discusses Utilitarianism: actions that produce moral good and how personal integrity is more affected than justice. Williams also discusses Consequentialism and uses two examples of negative responsibility to justify his reasoning. In his introduction Williams, rejects utilitarianism and its consequentialist structure. Williams breaks down utilitarianism’s consequentialist structure of human life into two forms (direct and indirect)

He finds a solution that is best for everyone that will be affected by his decision. In Scenario 2 Catalina must decide whether or not to report and cancel three sales so that she and her coworkers can receive their bonuses. Using the consequentialism philosophy, this was kind of two-sided. If Catalina took the advice of her fellow employee, she would report the three sales in order for everyone to get their vacation packages, larger bonuses, and new equipment, then cancel the three sales

Can Utilitarianism be defended against the Injustice Objection?   In this essay, I will argue that utilitarianism cannot be defended against the injustice objection. Utilitarians may be able to reply to the injustice objection in some cases by invoking one of two replies, the ‘Long term consequences’ reply, in which utilitarians will avoid unjust actions that increase short-term utility because in the long-term they will not lead to the greatest good. The other reply that may help utilitarianism

The utilitarian faces many problems because he loses any ability to live a personal life. By this is meant that in making decisions the utilitarian must consider the steps which lead to the highest level of goodness in society. The utilitarian reaches for the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Two main aspects dominate the light of utilitarian beliefs. The consequentialist principle explains that in determining the rightness or wrongness of an act one must examine the results that will

the moral status of an action. Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that morality should be based on producing the most amount of happiness for the most about of people as possible with our actions. Utilitarianism is made up of three parts: consequentialism, hedonism, and impartiality. We must

conclusion through the concept of Consequentialism. This is said to have been accurate for centuries, as Consequentialism focuses strictly on the outcome and consequences of actions. The reason for this is the common belief by many that outcome is everything. Throughout the last three weeks, I have developed a better view on Consequentialism. Through the writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Mill, I have learned basic methods of applying Utilitarianism and Consequentialism to ethical situations. As a brief

The case of Jenni Lake Stage 3 astrocytoma also called anaplastic astrocytoma is a tumor which the causes are still unknown. It attacks the brain and the spinal cords. The treatment for this tumor is rude. This case present a girl, Jenni Lake, 17 years old, which suffers of this disease. She was diagnosed with 3 tumors on her brain and 3 others on her spine. However, she is young and has the great chances to recover from her tumors. Nevertheless, the treatment required some restrictions and is

This argumentative essay will discuss the morality of one spending all their time and money on family and friends, rather than helping others. I will argue that it is morally correct to spend all your time and money on friends and family because every individual should be autonomous and govern their own life based on their values. I will argue this with the fact that as humans, we are rational beings and have the ability to give value to our beliefs through action. If a person believes that it is

Consequence Ethics; judging actions by the outcome rather than the act of doing; only the “consequences” or the results are important. There are many styles of consequentialism; one of which is Utilitarian. By definition, utilitarian ethics say “we should pursue the greatest good for the greatest number” (Brusseau, 2012). How is the lottery an example of the utilitarian monster? First, we need to outline what a utilitarian monster is before deciding if it applies in this case. A utilitarian monster