Consequentialism Essay

Do the end justifies the means? In this essay I will be answering the question 'do the ends justify the means in the case of terrorism?' In other words, does the final outcome justify the way the final outcome was reached? For example, if a man stole bread from a shop in order to feed his family did he do the right thing?However, today we are going to talk about a very important topic that has been debated for decades: Terrorism. Also because the benefit come at the cost of a great amount of death

When you look at today’s corporate environment it can be intimidating to some and full of political agenda to others it’s a dog eat dog world in cooperate America. Businesses are built on standards, policy and procedures to guide the employee to be fair and conduct business with ethical standards. In today’s business and corporate environment there are ethical company standards which all associates must follow but businesses and their representatives are not moral agents. These are two (2) of the

Today, the working industry and employers have made substantial progress towards gender equality pay and more career opportunities for woman in the workforce. However, gender pay gap still raises an ethical concern that exists between women and men as well as discrimination for the same type of job function. Women have struggled since the mid-1900’s to gain the respect of the working-class industry. They wanted to be treated justly and receive the same equal employment opportunities as men. In

From the movie “Iron Man” we see that Tony Stark has made some decisions that are serious ethical decisions, the following are five examples. When Tony Stark is imprisoned by a terrorist group, and is asked to make Jericho missile, he refuses to do so. He is doing it for benefit of the larger in the world, despite that he might be in danger. This is the right decision justified by utilitarianism and virtue theory. Tony declares to shut down weapon manufacturing division, he does it for “the highest

To all of this must be added the inability or blindness by the BDO auditor to detect or publish the irregularities committed, falling into a lack of professional ethics in the duty to carry out an exhaustive control of the accounts and not merely testimonial as they have done. The continuous failures and the delays in the payments did not get the attention of the banks, which are considered to have made in many cases the "blind eye" for being Pescanova, or that accustomed to these actions went through

Philippa Foot, a philosopher, argued that moral judgments have a rational basis. The choices we make in our lives are based on a number of varying and different factors. Theories such as the principle of double effect are meant to back up the choices we make in society. The doctrine of the double effect relies strongly on the difference between what a person “foresees” as an outcome of their individual actions, and what they actually intended the outcome to be (Timmons, 2012, p. 93). This theory

Consequentialists argue that respecting what a person wants brings about beneficial consequences. MacKinnon and Fiala write, “On consequentialist grounds, we should do what, in fact, is most likely to bring about the greatest happiness, not only for ourselves but also for all those affected by our actions” (MacKinnon and Fiala). This side feels if people have a say in how their life will end this will bring peace of mind and maximize happiness although not every decision only affects the patient

Utilitarianism is a practical doctrine that is widely accepted in modern society’s economics, politic, and ethics. Utilitarian is driven by the pursuit of happiness. For a utilitarian, everything that will be helpful in the pursuit is considered good. In utilitarianism, an action is good or evil based on its consequences on the happiness of an individual and the happiness of the community. Similar to other doctrine, utilitarianism is not without a flaw. Bernard Williams, in his paper Utilitarianism

Consequentialism is determining whether actions are justified based on the consequences of the action. Singer’s approach of utilitarianism, a form of consequentialism, is deepened by arguing that the consequences of the action for all life that is able to perceive pleasure or pain must be taken into account in determining whether the action is right or wrong. Deontology takes a different approach to how actions are determined just. According to Regan’s view, an action is not considered right or wrong

you’re doing is against the law, or against human rights, what matters is that your actions bring about a positive change. That is what makes an action morally right or wrong. Within consequentialism, there are other numerous theories, one of which is called utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism that was founded by a man named Jeremy Bentham. This form states that the good and moral thing to do resulted in happiness, pleasure, and well-being. For instance, an act is morally