Terrorism is an actual and relevant threat to national security that requires an incisive strategy to fight it. Along this paper, I demonstrate that torture is not the right solution to respond to terrorism, whereas surveillance might be a better and acceptable proposal. Several scholars and politicians have either widely sustained or contested both issues. In my opinion, torture does not ensure success in fighting terrorism while it inflicts unbearable sufferance. I provide six arguments to demonstrate
In his practical imperative, Immaneul Kant puts forward the concept that you must “act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end.” This imperative is premised on Kant’s idea that the existence of every rational being has value in and of itself. By way of contrast, Kant juxtaposes this intrinsic value of rational beings with the instrumental value of objects that can solely
A consequentialist is committed to the view that the rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely on its consequences. The right action is the one with the best possible consequences realizable under the circumstances. The consequences considered may be either the direct consequences of the particular action, or the consequences of a general rule the action instantiates, a disposition it expresses, or an institution or practice it serves. In any case, the value of the consequences must be
A: Introduction to Normative Ethics "Moral Objectivism: The view that what is right or wrong doesn"t depend on what anyone thinks is right or wrong. That is, the view that the 'moral facts ' are like 'physical ' facts in that what the facts are does not depend on what anyone thinks they are. Objectivist theories tend to come in two sorts:"(1) "(i) Duty Based Theories (or Deontological Theories): Theories that claim that what determines whether an act is morally right or wrong is the kind of act
The use of torture as a weapon for coercing an individual to do or say something of desire or for intimidation is a widely debated subject worldwide, though some level of torture is utilized by most countries, including those that are often regarded as being highly civil (Cahn, 2016, p.296-27). Given that, based on data from Amnesty International, the use of torture is on the rise, it is extremely important to explore the moral significance of torture as a weapon of both coercion and intimidation
Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory about how we as people should asses the vast area of things that involves choices that people face. Utilitarianism is one of the well-known and most influential moral theories in normative ethics. Like other forms of consequentialist, its main concept is that weather actions are morally right or wrong depending on their consequence. Utilitarian believe that the principle of morality is to enhance life by boosting the amount of great things like bliss, happiness
Question #2: The Meatpacking Factory According to classical utilitarianism, we must “allocate the total amount of happiness among as many people as possible” (Pojman, 218). When analyzing whether to allow the Islamic employees the right to pray on break, utilitarians may argue that allowing Islamic employees, who only make up 20% of the factory population, the right to pray is a decision that focuses on the minority as opposed to what is best for the majority. Furthermore, there is evidence that
Drones or unmanned aircraft are like a hammer or gun. They are tools. They are not inherently good or bad. How they are used becomes the ethical issue at hand. Drones have a broad spectrum of wage; from the delivery of pizza, to weather forecasting, to weapons platforms in armed conflict. It is the purpose of this paper to show the use of drones in warfare is necessary and can be ethically justified using the principles of both deontology and utilitarianism. The fact that drones are remotely controlled
Imagine being told you may have only one meal a week or that the water you are drinking is contaminated and there is no medical assistance to treat you for the bacteria you just ingested. For many of us, this is not an issue, in fact we probably don’t even think about it on a daily basis. Unfortunately, a lack of shelter, food, clean water, and medical care is the norm for many in our world. Be it falling on hard times, war, acts of nature, or simply not enough resources, there are millions of
conditions are completed. There are 4 main issues that being raised from this article. One of the main issues that can be raised from this article is consequentialism. Consequentialism is the kind of normative ethical theories holding that the results of one's administration are the final basis for any judgment about