Consequentialism Essay

In ethics, there are two main theories, the theory of consequentialism and deontologism. Deontologism states the justification of an action is based off of the action. This means that if the action that needs to be taken for something even greater happen is bad, then it is not rational and should not occur. Consequentialism on the other hand, states that in order to justify an action, the result positivity must outweigh the negativity caused by the action. Singer’s view on consequentialist, the

This article is about Tesco who was accused to sustain murder of Amazon rainforest by selling meat products that was stolen form the jungle. After few years of investigation, Greenpeace found that the meat was imported to different places like UK’s chain. The complained by Greenpeace proposed that the Brazilian supplier (JBS) causes the meat production to supplies to Tesco from illegally land. Meat products includes “corned beef, tinned mince and steak chunks” and this is all originated from area

Act consequentialism is the philosophical belief that an action is right if it brings about the best consequences or state of affairs out of all of the actions that are available to an agent. For example, a man comes to your house and tells you to tell him where your father is so that he can kill him. The act consequentialist would say that it is perfectly acceptable to lie about the whereabouts of your father in order to save his life. This is because telling the truth would result in your father’s

Consequentialism is a theory that suggests that the morality of an action is to be judged solely by its consequences. In this case, this is what the greater good is defined as; a decision made that would positively impact the majority of a community and would lead to further progression. For the greater good to be achieved, one must do a little wrong. Now, what is defined as wrong? How do we tell the difference from right and wrong? To what extent must one go to, for their actions to be defined as

negative effects. This is what drives me to choose to explain one of the types of ethics that is consequentialism. According to the definition of consequentialism, an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable. Right thing or wrong depend of the consequences of an act, and that the more good consequences are produced, the better the act, says the consequentialism. This ethical type us the guidance of how to live in our community, our society, and the world

fetus which is not a full human being yet. 3. When choosing an entirely different ethical theory then the Warren’s, I am choosing consequentialism. Consequentialism is a type of moral theory according to which the consequences of actions are all that matter in determining the rightness and wrongness of an action. Unitarianism is the most prominent form of consequentialism. “Utility”, which refers to the net value of the consequences of actions- how much overall welfare or happiness would likely result

in the law system. To justify my reasoning for keeping the death penalty, I looked into the consequentialist outlook of utilitarianism as well as the two camps of consequentialism and the kantian perspective of fairness and justice. To first support the idea of the death penalty still being imposed today, we can look at consequentialism. A motto that defends the consequentialists

and to increase the welfare of happiness is to balance pleasure over pain (Sandel). Utilitarian actions are correct if they promote the welfare of the greatest amount and wrong if it decreases that welfare or well-being(Baggini and Fosl, 57). Consequentialism is a moral theory that claims that the wrongness of actions results in consequences (Baggini and Fosl, 56). It also is actions or rules that are right or wrong which depends on the result being a good or bad consequence. Hedonistic is actions

This paper aims to introduce in a brief yet detailed and objective way the ethical philosophy of Consequentialism. This essay will also analyze an ethical dilemma from the point of view of this ethical theory and resolve the decision-making process based on it. Consequentialism argues that what makes an action ethically right or wrong is the good or bad consequences of such action. Consequentialism does not start giving priority to ethical standards as it does Deontologism, but giving priority to

According to The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “consequentialism is a theory of normative ethics. It holds that an act is only moral or ethical if it results in a good conclusion.” In other words, if one thinks that something is going to end up with a good result, then doing something immoral to achieve that result is justified. In Yann Martel’s award winning novel, Life of Pi, the main character, Pi, a youthful teen stranded in the ocean with only a tiger to support him, is faced with the