Crito Essay

In both Plato’s Apology and Crito, Plato presents Socrates arguments clearly and precisely. Socrates is wise man with a different perspective on life, which presents us with a mass of contradictions. Socrates is an expressive man, yet he never recorded any works. He is ignorant, but wrongfully convicted who is willing to fight his unjust execution. Behind these dilemmas is an opposition not often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic of philosophers, who is dedicated to his state. Exploring this

is set in the prison cell of Socrates, where he calmly waits for his execution. Before dawn, he is visited by Crito, an old and loyal friend of his. There, Crito lets him know that he has bribed the guards and made arrangements to smuggle Socrates out of prison and into safety. However, Socrates seems rather unmoved, and insists that he must stay in anticipation for his own execution. Crito presents an onslaught of arguments as to why Socrates must escape.1 Then Socrates rebuttals2, refusing Crito’s

Crito gives many seemingly valid reasons for socrates to escape. Socrates on the other hand does not believe that crito’s reasons for him to escape are really any valid. One of the first reasons critos talks about for as to why socrates should escape jail is friendship. Should Socrates die crito would not only lose such and important friend, but the people of athens would judge crito as someone who values money over friendship. In ancient athens is seems to be the norm that if you are going to be

young children. When the ship was about to arrive, Crito, Socrates’s old faithful friend, arrives early to where they held Socrates. The guard allows Crito to see Socrates because he offered them a bribe. Crito becomes surprised on how Socrates remains calm even when facing a death sentence.

disciples help was justifiable. Although initially Crito’s argument is compelling, Socrates paints a far stronger picture of the moral rightness that Crito draws on for his argument. Crito attempts to sway Socrates by conjuring a sense of guilt within him. By saying “you are betraying your sons” and “I feel ashamed on your behalf” (Plato, Crito 45d-45e) Crito is trying to make Socrates virtuous side flare up. However, this approach pushes Socrates to make an argument that embodies the law as a person and

When Socrates rejects the plan of Crito helping him escape jail even with a successful plan where he would live a pleasant life in exile. Crito saw no wrong in helping Socrates escape from jail because Socrates is a victim of unjust laws. Socrates then creates a dialogue for Crito between himself and the laws of Athens that gives a view on how discipline Socrates is to the Athens laws even with being innocent and sentenced to death Socrates is still wanting to be obedient to the Athens laws. Socrates

three main arguments that Crito said to convince Socrates to escape jail are Socrates’ responsible for his sons, the situation where his friends will help him escape, and the just and unjust. Crito argued that if Socrates’ decides to die, he’s just going to betray his sons. If Socrates’ won’t escape the jail, he will hurt Crito’s reputation.(Crito, 47c) The last main argument, which is the fact that Crito will help Socrates’ escape jail, is a weak argument because Crito is saying that he will

The concept of individual rights refers to the freedom each individual possesses to pursue life without interference from other individuals or the government. A community is a collection of said individuals, with common interests and values, who take up community responsibilities to ensure that the collection holds objective standards that are beneficiary to all. Even though these concepts are intrinsically linked, in that one cannot survive without the other, there is often a desire to separate

was one of the most distinguished philosophers to demonstrate free will. He would demonstrate this by choosing in which manner he would perish, and when the phenomenon would transpire. His apprentice Plato would write with reference to this in Crito. On the other hand, Niccolo Machiavelli from the Renaissance epoch, writes references to the fate of one in The Prince. He would acknowledge the virtues that under any circumstances could dictate and control one’s fate. Socrates and Machiavelli

from his punishment. Crito tries to convince Socrates presenting three arguments on why Socrates should escape. But Socrates main reason for not doing so is that doing unfair actions harms the soul of one, and that life is not worth living with a soul in ruins. Socrates Athenian philosopher, with possibility of death. He has