Defense of Abortion Essay

A Defense of Abortion Author(s): Judith Jarvis Thomson Source: Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Autumn, 1971), pp. 47-66 Published by: Blackwell Publishing Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265091 Accessed: 10/01/2010 00:54 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior

Judith Jarvis Thomson article “A Defense of Abortion” is different than most debates over abortion. In her article she says fetus have a right, but puts her argument she is making in the mothers perspective for her readers to see. Thomson believes that the mother has a right to her own body more than a fetus has a right to be classifies as a person. She test the theory by giving a few stories to make it easier to understand. To explain that if “All person have right to life” she gives the example

Judith Jarvis Thomson’s “A Defense of Abortion” is a uniquely reasoned argument for the right to abortion that uses strong analogies to challenge pro-life arguments that are based on the premise that a human life begins at the moment of conception. In this paper I will argue that Thomson is correct in her view and that her analogies solidify her argument, which then becomes impervious to criticism from philosophers like Keith J. Pavlischek or David B. Hershenov who bring up other factors irrelevant

you find it sound or, if unsound, what false premises and or fallacies you find. Do you think the examples/analogies strengthen the author's argument? What do you think of the "After-Birth Abortion" argument? (See the short article with the link on the Content page.) In the article In Defense of Abortion and Infanticide, author Michael Tooley’s main argument/thesis is that fetuses or unborn babies do not possess the right to life under the basis that it does not “possess the concept of continuing

instance, should abortion be considered one of the select inalienable rights for women? This topic of human rights,

In this paper I will discus and examine Judith Jarvis Thomson’s view upon abortion as stated in her argument “A Defense of Abortion”. I will explain her view on the issue and look deeper into her supporting arguments she included in her essay. I will also explain whether I agree with her statements. I would also discuss whether the person can agree with my statements and reason why having an abortion make you in moral. In her opening statement she first starts of stating a fetus is consider to

beliefs on the issues of welfare, abortion, gun control, education and defense spending. . Welfare: As a Democrat, I am support our current welfare system. I believe in helping the needy and increasing minimum wage. The

Annual Abortion Rate US New and World Report state that 43 percent of American women will have an abortion in their lifetime. In America abortion is as common as divorce and three times more common than breast cancer. Twice as many women get abortions as complete college degrees. There are approximately 1.4 million abortions performed each year in the United States with 89 percent of these prior to the twelfth week of gestation (Waldman, Ackermann and Rubin). Of the abortions performed 44 percent

Should Abortion Be an Option? Murder. What do people think of murder? Killing in self-defense. What do people think of killing out of self defense? Murdering someone else in “self-defense”, when it is really out of “inconvenience.” What do people think of murdering out of inconvenience, while claiming it is out of “self-defense?” Most would say that murder is wrong and killing out of self-defense is justified. Others would say that murdering out of inconvenience is wrong, while some still claim

The themes surrounding abortion tend to generally scathe on a surface level and truly uncover all the underlying themes of the popular topic, the articles “Stem Cells, Sex and Procreation” by John Harris, “A Defense of Abortion” by Judith Thomson, and “Are Pregnant Women Fetal Containers?” by Laura Purdy all discuss the theme of the woman’s and fetuses health and the consequences that can come with both keeping and rejecting the a fetus. In “Are Pregnant Women Fetal Containers?” Purdy acknowledges