Ethical Relativism Essay

Ethical relativism is “the theory that there are no universally valid moral principles” (Pojman). Cultural relativism, which falls under the category of ethical relativism, is the philosophical view that no culture is better than another culture when analyzing their systems of society. Cultural beliefs and assumptions are equally right along with the truth itself being relative to its environmental culture. Objective relativism is the opposite of ethical relativism and states “that there are universal

to define ethical relativism. Ethical relativism is a theory that moral does not reflect objective standard from right and wrong but it views what is right and wrong. The Christian believe that God was the source of morality but rather moral relativism was not based on any absolute strand are. Ethical truth is based on the variable such as situation or culture. The opposite point of view is the objective right and wrong is called the objectivism. There are two form of ethical relativism individual

I. Ethical Relativism a. Ethical Relativism is the general idea that the views of a society determine what is either right or wrong. That the views of a society is the absolute truth and should be followed. b. While I don’t agree with this, a strong example of Relativism is “honor-killings” that Shafer talks about. What he talks about is generally that as a society in the middle-east, if a woman defies men, or is tainted (raped) that it is the right of the man of a house hold to execute a woman because

In the realm of ethics, one ultimately establishes an ethical theory, or a theory that proposes ethical standards. The two main positions one must choose are either ethical objectivism or ethical relativism. Though there are arguments both in favor and against each perspective, the outlook one will adopt depends on the individual and his or her background. In order to choose a position, one must understand what ethical relativism and ethical objectivism are. After looking at and understanding both

Ethical relativism is a theory based on the belief that there are no general standards that are considered to be ethically acceptable. Ethical relativists believe that there is no actual standard of what is right or wrong. The two forms of ethical relativism are personal, or individual ethical relativism and cultural ethical relativism. Personal relativism, also called individual relativism, is based on the belief that ethical opinions are manifested by the moral viewpoints of each individual

Lets first define what ethical relativism is, Santa Clara University explains it very simple in a easy to understand definition. It is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. The same action may be morally right in one society but be morally wrong in another (Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J.; Michael J. Meyer [Santa Clara University]

has sought to understand the inner workings of what we call morality. This morality has been viewed through different lenses and interpreted in various ways. Among these interpretations are the two meta-ethical theories we will discuss: ethical realism and ethical relativism. Both of these ethical theories attempt to answer the question of what it means for something to be right and wrong. Are some actions innately right and wrong, or are they relative to specific cultural, religious, or individual

“Ethical relativism theory believes there is no universal accepted ethical standard and no objective right or wrong.”( Velasquez, M.August, 1992)Morality or what is considered right or wrong depends on the moral norms of society and can only be judged on its own. An actions that may be morally right in one society many not be considered morally right to another, albeit the practices may be different their fundamental moral principles are the same. This does not imply that all practices are relative

Cultural ethical relativists believe that morality is dependent on the culture the individual is involved with. While physical laws are universally accepted, morals are objective depending on where someone lives or who they grew up around. Furthermore, morality is formed based on the history of political and social instances in cultural ethical relativism. This theory of cultural ethical relativism is widely accepted throughout the world. It is so popular because there is empirical evidence that

against moral relativism as the correct way to judge human morality. There are several issues with moral relativism, and I will focus on why moral relativism’s argument is false and also consider the implications of accepting relativism. I will propose an alternative framework for making moral judgments about right and wrong and consider relativist objections. Philosophers often vary in their usage of moral relativism, so, for the purpose of this paper, I will be considering moral relativism to be the