Ethical Relativism Essay

are true, ethical relativism is false. Namely, the arguments against ethical relativism are weak. Primarily, your argument used the Bible. As a Bible believer, I agree with your statements: the Bible argues for moral absolutes rather than ethical relativism. For instance, the Ten Commandments are true for anyone and the God’s standards are absolute. However, anyone who is skeptical concerning the Bible would not view the Scriptures as a credible source to argue against ethical relativism. Therefore

Ethical Relativism V/S Objectivism 1. How should rational people and citizens of a democratic society argue about values? The Ethical relativist will argue that there are no moral absolutes or moral right or wrongs. Thus in a society where all members think in this way, it would be nearly impossible to argue for values. One portion of the people might think it is fine to steal if you are starving, while another group might think it is wrong to do so. However, Objectivism allows for individual

Ethical Relativism, Cultural Relativism, and Ethical Absolutism Ethical relativists argue that what is morally right or wrong may vary in fundamental way from person to person or from culture to culture. In other words, as Robert Arrington (1983) argues, we cannot simply say that a moral judgement is true for all purposes, persons, and cultures-we can assert only that it is true for a particular person or social group. Cultural relativism is a form of relativism that claims that moral beliefs and

December 19, 2014 Ethical Relativism Moral or Immoral Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one 's culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. Moral or ethical relativism is the idea that what is considered moral or immoral depends on the accepted behaviors within the society in which the determination is made. Therefore, what is considered moral or ethical in one society

Ethical Claims Between Stace and Benedict’s arguments I was able to narrow them down to the main points of ethical absolutism and relativism. I believe that Benedict’s argument towards ethical relativism is more accurate in our world today. Morality and the judgment of right and wrong can differ because of religious reasons, the culture you were brought up in, or who you were brought up by. There is no one moral structure standing that people of all cultures and society believe in. Morality can

Introduction When I first looked at the instructions for this assignment the ethical dilemma I wanted to talk about came immediately to mind. It was a decision I made more than fifteen years ago but I still remember it and had never thought of it in terms of ethics before. When I started this unit and began looking at situations from that perspective I became more intrigued and wondered if any of the readings could help me understand why I came to the decision I did . I once made the decision to

Ethical Relativism James Rachels starts with the differences between cultures, indicating that some normal practice in a culture may look quite horrendous in another. Whereas, in the condemner’s culture might exist a practice which equally looks and sound unacceptable. In its support, Rachels brings the example of the Greeks and the Callatians and reflects both sides’ viewpoints in respect to opposite side’s burial rituals. He then asks how the practicing party would think of their own ritual,

In contrast, ethical subjectivists claim that each individual decides which moral standards are correct (291). This theory suggests that moral statements can be true and false. - right or wrong - but they refer only to people’s attitudes, rather than their actions. Ethical subjectivism is rather that ethics is subject to one’s opinions. Something is morally acceptable on the basis that the person(s) approves and commitments allow. Therefore, equally an action is wrong/immoral if that person disapproves

If ethical truths are determined by one’s opinions or cultural ideal, then would it not be impossible for one’s ethical opinions or cultural ideals to ever be wrong? In terms of ethical relativism, the moral views of all individuals or all cultures are all equally good and therefore nothing can be intrinsically valuable, as they are all the same. Things are valuable only because we accept them as such. If there is no way for us to be wrong, then there is no value in being right, as everything is

Out of the seven basic ethical theories relativism is the farthest from me. For someone to think that there is no wrong makes it difficult in a lot of the situation to judge the way someone act or the decision they make. Everyone does not think the same I may think in a certain situations that I made the right decision but another people can think that was the wrong decision. We live in a world where no one mind thinks the same you cannot tell where a person mind set stands. You cannot say that