Glass Ceiling Essay

The “glass ceiling” has made it difficult or impossible for women to rise in the ranks. The further women progress in the workforce, the closer they are to shattering it. The glass ceiling is a term that has seen a lot of widespread use in the mass media that has caused the true meaning of the glass ceiling has been skewed. Women in the glass ceiling are in the top of middle management and they are stopping and getting stuck.

promoted into higher levels of responsibility in their companies often meet resistance that prevents them from achieving the goal of a senior or executive level of management. This barrier is referred to as the “glass ceiling” and it is a controversial issue in our country today. The glass ceiling called this because women are able to see the higher level positions, but can reach them because of an intangible barrier. One can look at the Fortune 500 companies, which are the most successful companies in

to be a strong case of evidence or at least some type of speculation involved before a case can even be considered. Lastly, under this category, minorities suffer due to inadequate reporting systems that are in place to be the mediator for the glass ceiling phenomenon. • Others - We can press

powerful professional, academic and corporate positions once reserved for men, the ever present glass ceiling still deters the advancement of large segment of the female workforce (Gregory, 2003). Interest in the careers of females remained strong among both scholars and practitioners. Women have made considerable progress in entering the managerial ranks also but not at the highest levels.

worth, and second shift in her book, Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead, and her TedTalk and advises women to advocate for themselves in order to achieve equality the workplace. One of the first issues Sandberg addresses is the glass ceiling. Glass ceiling is this unacknowledged barrier that prevents advancement in a profession. Shining some light on this issue, Sandberg shares with the crowd a moment of embarrassment she experienced after one of her presentations. While presenting to an

particularly in managerial positions, which creates glass ceilings for women who can do as good or better job as their male counterparts. It is a sad fact that sexism still exists in the twenty-first century. What is the glass ceiling you may ask? The glass ceiling is (Bell, Mclaughlin, & Sequeira, 2002) as “the invisible or artificial barriers that prevent women (and people of colour) from advancing past a certain level” (Federal Glass Ceiling Commission-FGCC, 1997; Morison and von Glinow, 1990)

I am a woman living in a world where nearly everything is done by women and yet controlled by men. It doesn’t matter if that work is within the home or in the public workforce. Women are seen as the driving force behind much of the work that is being done. In nearly 40% of all American households, women are the primary breadwinners and provide the majority of the household’s income (Shaw and Lee, Women’s Voices Feminist Visions, pg. 470). But that hardly matters. Men are still seen in nearly all

paper was to explore the impact of the “glass ceiling” in corporate America, identify the challenges, and examine what problems women or minorities face when pursuing the rise up the corporate ladder. The paper also reviews and identifies the socioeconomic gender gaps, trends and impacts of work-life issues, and the lack of mentorship available to women or minorities. Results of research and studies

However, if a woman is not assertive enough then the business might think she is not committed to the job she is doing. There is also a “glass ceiling” put in place for many women. A “glass ceiling” is a goal that one would think can be achieved but really it is an unattainable goal due to policies or corporate culture. Many women feel the impact of the glass ceilings as they start climbing the business ladder.

Table 3: Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Squared Multiple Correlation Cronbach 's Alpha if Item Deleted CC1 57.2069 11.073 .407 .396 .165 CC2 57.0345 11.080 .341 .279 .180 CC3 56.8966 11.791 .308 .207 .211 CC4 56.9540 13.370 .039 .252 .298 CC5 56.7816 12.545 .167 .325 .260 CC6 56.9770 12.418 .208 .311 .248 CC7 56.7471 13.935 -.104 .304 .349 CC8 57.6207 14.796 -.244 .336 .378 CC9 57.8046 13.764 -.071 .157 .337 CC10