Gospel of Mark Essay

Craig Blomberg, New Testament Scholar and Professor at Denver Seminary, provides an insightful commentary on the Gospel of Matthew. Blomberg investigates the text using a historical, literary, and theology analysis. The commentary begins with an introduction analyzing the following 7 topics regarding the entirety of the Matthean Gospel: (1) structure, (2) theology, (3) purpose and audience, (4) sources, (5) date, (6) author, (7) and historicity and genre. Blomberg, then, throughout the rest of the

New Testament. He starts off with the diversity of early Christianity and the large amount of Christian documents that were written during the second century. Ehrman also discusses which Christian literature became canon, including the gospels written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, as well as the epistles and book of revelation. Ch. 2: Do we have the original New Testament? In this chapter, Ehrman tells the reader about the fact that the scriptures we have currently regarding the New Testament aren’t

On the other hand, Mark's audience is mostly for Gentiles or a mixed audience. Mark wants to iterate that Jesus is the son of God, but he does it in a way that appeals to the outsiders. Mark writes in ways that a little more mysterious than Matthew's, but after comparing the two passages, there are some similarities as well. By looking at both passages as well as the authors, several similarities and

In Raymond Brown’s introduction to the Gospel of Mark, he notes that the Gospels require particularly careful reading, because people are often familiar with their content and must avoid letting that familiarity color their reading (Brown, 126). This sentiment rings true when examining a peculiarity in Mark’s Gospel: rather than proclaiming his divine status as Messiah, Jesus often seems to hide his identity, from demons, crowds, and even his own disciples. This “Messianic Secret” runs so counterintuitive

the Bible holds to you. When understanding the truth, whichever way you see fit, there are several resources you can use. Ones that we have been discussing quite thoroughly are the Gospels, an article written by Luke Timothy Johnson, How is the Bible True?, and quite frankly our own opinions. When it comes to the Gospels, there is no way of knowing which one is actually “true,” or historically accurate. They all tell a different version of the life Jesus lived, and there is no way of knowing which

women “followed him, and ministered to him” in Galilee (NRSV, Mark 15: 40-41). Thurston explains that “’to follow’ is a technical term for discipleship throughout the Gospel” and she also explains that “ministered” is best translated to “provided” or “served” (Thurston 69). Therefore, Jesus’ male disciples followed him and were expected to minister, actions which were also carried out by the women as depicted in the Gospel of Mark (i.e. Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joses, etc)

The issued with the doublets In the Matthew’s account of the Gospel as well as in the Luke’s there are several duplicates of the same text, while in the Gospel of Mark the same text appears only once, one of this examples is found in Mark, in the parable of the measure, (Mk. 4:25[NRSV]). The same declaration, almost word for word appears twice in separate occasions in Matthew verses 13:12 and in 25:29 and in Luke 8:18 as well as in 19:26. The same dynamic appears twenty two times in Matthew where

In the synoptic gospels, Jesus’ exorcisms are portrayed as one of the major acts in Jesus mission to the kingdom of God. The gospels not only narrate Jesus casting out the demons and cleansing the possessed bodies, but also implicitly suggests the controversy he evokes among the Jewish and Roman authorities of Judea and Galilee. The context of New Testament Gospels is deeply rooted in the Greco-Roman world and as such paints the background of the Jesus’ actions and messages. Several scholarly publications

In Matthew 26:25 and Mark, 14:21, during the Last Supper, Jesus talks about someone betraying him. Matthew states that it was Judas whom betrayed Jesus, however Mark did not state any disciple who betrayed him. While the disciples were eating during the last supper in Matthew 26:28, Jesus gives thanks and declares that the wine is his blood and is poured out “for many for the forgiveness of sins.” Mark and Matthews gospel were very similar except Matthew altered and added in the “forgiveness of sins”

Discipleship is an important message in both Mark’s and Luke’s Gospels. It seems to me that Luke edited Marks’s version of events because Mark’s story didn’t correspond to the message that Luke wanted to emanate about what it means to be a true disciple of Jesus. Both Gospel’s agree on the basics, and that discipleship means following Jesus. But they differ on the details. In Mark disciples often make mistakes, and have much to learn. Mark doesn’t expect his followers to be perfect but expects them