Gospel of Matthew Essay

the Gospel of Matthew from Daniel Harrington’s commentary “The Gospel of Matthew”, This paper will explain the teachings of the “6 Antithesis” in chapter 5 verses 21-48, and the main point on “Jesus came not to abolish but to “fulfill” the Law and Prophets (Harrington 90).” This paper will also have Daniel Harrington interpretations of the writing of the gospel of Matthew. I believe that Jesus had a reason for his teachings and how he went forward to preach them to the congregation. In Matthew chapter

Jesus’ longest prophecy about the time of the end is found in the synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke, with each giving their own accounts of the day that they were with Him on the Mount of Olives. It is commonly referred to as The Olivet Prophecy, and it is an overview of the circumstantial events that will lead to Jesus’ return. This prophecy was given during the week before His crucifixion, and it is pivotal to understanding the future events that will affect the entire world. The prophecy

Authorship, audience and genre of the Gospel of Matthew Authorship: Most scholars, but not R.T. France (2007, pp14-22), believe that Matthew’s Gospel was written by a scribe, not the Apostle Matthew and that it was written approximately between AD 80- 90. France states that if the book was written at this time- it was within Matthew’s lifetime, and thus authorship cannot be proven. A key reason pointing to the Gospel being written by a scribe is that the Gospel was written in Greek and that the author

genealogy of Matthew 1 is faithful to the genealogy of the Hebrew Bible. In other words, Jesus is the one who has legitimately inherited the throne of Israel on line. It is important that this is the genealogy of the Hebrew Bible. All the Old Testament passages cited in the New Testament cite the Hebrew Bible, but rather the '70' translated into Greek. However, the genealogy of the Bible is different from the Hebrew Biblical genealogy. In other words, the author of the Gospel of Matthew did not build

Peter, one of the most important disciples in the Gospels of Matthew and Mark, is portrayed as Jesus’ acquaintance and pupil; as well as one of Jesus’ most important followers. Both of the Gospels seem to portray Peter in similar ways, yet they draw different images of the disciple. In the Gospel of Matthew, Peter has a much larger appearance in the teachings of Jesus and becomes more significant to Jesus throughout the Christian doctrine. However, in Mark, the author portrays Peter as a much lesser

The canon brought the four gospels about, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (Evangelists) . These four gospels paint a different picture of Christ and were written for different audiences. Matthew, Mark and Luke are said to be very similar to each other. But, there is things which are common to Matthew and Luke that aren’t seen in Mark. Matthew and Luke used another source which Mark didn’t know about, the ‘Q’ source. John’s gospel is quite different to the other three. He is shown as someone who is very

There are many different gospels that tell a similar story. Matthew and Mark are two Gospels written in a similar way but have different audiences. The story is the Last Supper and is about the last meal that Jesus experienced with his Apostles before his Sacrifice. There are many similarities, but not very many differences. Overall, the same story is told, but from two different perspectives.  The Gospel according to Matthew is the first book of the New Testament. The story explains how the Messiah

The Gospels are essential texts of the Christian faith as they chronical the life of Jesus Christ. And yet they are surrounded by controversies because they seem to conflict each other. But, in the case of the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of John, this concern is truly misplaced. Looking closer at the texts shows that they are not entirely dissimilar. Both texts are based in tradition and their relation to Jesus. The texts come from the same founding idea but the difference lies in their uses

is said to be the oldest written gospel but the literature never mentioned the author’s name. Mark was a rather powerful story of Jesus, which includes Jesus’ development through his path of becoming the anointed one (Millar, 2010, p. 19). However Matthew is very similar yet contrasting to marks gospel; the gospel was a very influential gospel until the modern times. The Gospel became powerful because Matthew claimed to be the first follower of Jesus and the gospel was part of the New Testament (Millar

of the Synoptic Gospels found in The Holy Bible. These include The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. When looking at them side by side readers will see that they have many differences and similarities. This has resulted in what is called The Synoptic Problem; that is, how do we account for these similarities and differences? Scholars have come up with an applicable solution called the four source solution Theory. This theory proposes that The Gospel of Mark was the first Gospel written and among