Historiography Essay

How the Indian historiography has evolved from precolonial to post-colonial period? Over the three millenniums, India has developed opulent and complex layers of culture, since geographically India lies at crossroads of trading routes. From ancient times, people from diverse background and ethnicity came into India as traders and invaders via land as well as sea routes. They settled down here and, over the time, India assimilated them in its cultural and social mosaic. Also, India remained a home

Enlightenment historiography neglect history? Arthur Marwick in his Fundamentals of History suggests that when studying history it is important that there is a distinction made between History and The Past, the former referring to the knowledge produced by historians about the past together with the teaching of that knowledge. Marwick states that the latter is just ‘everything that actually happened, whether known, or written, about by historians or not’. Enlightenment historiography is particularly

What is Historiography? The study and analysis of historical writings, the method of analyzing a historical period based on the perspectives of historians to the event. What is “critical analysis” in history writing? To critically analyze an event one must read about all aspects of a historical event in order to fully understand that historical era. This is done by examining several primary source documents, as well as the perspectives of several historians. This way we are able to break down a

Historiography in a brief definition is the record of what is known about the past and a number of interpretations through scholarly criticism. It focuses on historical research as it is constantly changing. Most of the interpretations before the nineteen sixties dealt with politics. It is through socials movements that scholarly literature began to include social, cultural, racial, gender and countercultural histories. Many people that studied history interpreted it very differently and out of this

A much early historiography of Karnataka by Aluru Venkatarao also delineates on similar lines identifying the juncture of Battle of Talikota in 1565 as the time of decline of glory of Karnataka. In his 1917 work titled Karnataka Gatha Vaibhava , Aluru Venkata Rao writes thus: Having flourished for 230 years this glorious kingdom disappeared in half a minute by accident. It dies. That was the end of Karnataka’s glory. The kumkum was wiped off Karnatakadevi’s forehead! The mangalsutra round her

up with an approach that does not treat historiographies as “History,” but as particular interpretations of history that can be used to multiply the number of observations to outnumber variables to make valid inferences: “if we treat our database as “historiography” or “histories” and not “History,” then the actual number of “cases” expands from the number of episodes to the number of accounts of those episodes”(Lusktick). The problems with historiographies is that, historians like many political

domestic historiography for over thirty years. This traditional approach is encapsulated in the theory of the ‘three rounds’ of the quasi-deliberate communist attempt to seize power by force of arms in 1943-1944, in December 1944 and in 1946-1949. The decade of the 1970s saw the emergence of a young generation of scholars who introduced a revisionist school of thought and marked a paradigm shift in the academic discourse on the 1940s. This generation, which continued to dominate the historiography of

deeply formulated ideas about the class of peasants as a social, cultural and political force aware of its distinct consciousness of subalternity made other subsequent 20th Century South Asian scholars working on the issues of Indian peasantry historiography resume his effort. This school led by Ranajit Guha came to be known as the Subaltern Studies Group or Subaltern Studies Collective which comprised a number of other South Asian historians, social critics and scholars like Shahid Amin, Dipesh Chakraborty

introduced in the late nineteenth century and held in place by national origins quotas until 1965. The purpose of this historiography is to show how recent scholarship on immigration has developed and changed in the last fifteen years. This historiography is divided into three types of studies. The first is focused on how historians have extricated the individual from the broad historiography to give voice to specific ethnic groups as they negotiated for a place in the country.

“real” jazz encompassed, and more importantly, what “real” jazz did not encompass. This construction of authenticity, often demarcated along racial lines, served to relegate several artists and styles (those outside a “mainstream” to the margins of historiography. The issue of race is central to all discourses of jazz. Alongside race goes the problem of representation, or, who gets to play what for whom and under what circumstance. Problems of

In 1947, the partition of India on the departure of British colonial power laid the seed for widespread bloodshed, Ritu Menon and Kamla Bhasin pioneer a new understanding of partition through the voices of affected women for the first time, whose stories were buried under the dust of time and the blankets of the patriarch. Authors, Ritu Menon and Kamla Bhasin both have strong roots in women’s studies. Menon as an independent scholar and publisher focused on violence against women, and Bhasin for

reconstructed and promoted mostly after 1989. There are wider factors in public history at work than the mere difficulty of obtaining sources. Some of the major barriers to Turing's renaissance during the second wave of heroism can be reckoned from historiography and context. Indeed these major reasons for obscurity are sometimes a point of reference for commentators highlighting present-day Britain's moral superiority over the past in recognising his heroic greatness, as Peter Tatchell has argued. 1

however, does not differentiate history from the word story, or “a record of past events”. History covers several disciplines, primarily comparative history and historiography. Comparative history is about learning and comparing the features of human experience and the different periods and societies in the history of mankind, while historiography is based on how historians make history, how sources are used in writing history, and how history should be studied based on certain

History has been traditionally told from the point of view of those with wealth and education. But to truly understand history one must understand the history of the people who were not writing the history which includes the nation’s minorities, working class and those without a high level of education. Society is made up of a variety of people and history is not complete without telling all of their stories. History was traditionally written by a select number of people. This leads to a biased

Historiography is the methodically of which history is written. There has been some controversy regarding the way historians portray women over the years, mainly because women tend to be unrepresented. Their importance is not stressed enough, historian devote little attention to class issues that seriously affected black women. Even when history is focused on African American studies, there is more of an emphasis on the black men, as opposed to black women. From the beginning, European whites have

The topic that the proposed book focuses on considers the contentious impact of the 1969 Stonewall Riots upon the struggle for LGBT+ rights. This potential monograph, entitled “Riots for Rights: the Debatable Influence of Stonewall,” pursues to furthermore enhance the argument concerning whether the 1969 Stonewall Riots began the public LGBT+ movement for further rights, or if the converse occurred, wherein this momentous protest instead the culminated the LGBT+ efforts of the previous years, merely

Despite what the title of Hobsbawm’s book can indicate at a first glance, his work is neither a step-by-step textbook of factual information about how history should be written nor a series of directly given guidelines that historians should follow. Instead it is a book composed of twenty-one essays that represent his own work transformed from their previous form as lectures, contributions to conferences or articles and reviews in different journals. As Hobsbawm himself explains, his reflections

This thesis will bridge the gap between these two theories. It will also address the theoretical division in the historiography. The architecture of Kirkbride asylums suggests that there was a dual purpose in the creation of these massive, imposing buildings; they were created to treat the mentally ill, but the idealistic writings of superintendents of this period did

Earlier issues of SHM include articles that are profoundly insistent upon the importance of ‘history from below’ in developing and constituting understandings of health and medicine. As these articles were primarily structured and written during the cultural and linguistic turn in historical analysis it is clear that they present arguments that aim to revise modernist approaches to the social history of medicine. Most of which are interested in the history of published medical texts or the views

Natalie Zemon-Davis’s 1983 book The Return of Martin Guerre provided both the public and academic world with a fresh and interesting take on a classic story. Presented like a mystery thriller, Davis weaves a tale of deception based on a solid framework of cultural history. Her narrative depends on grounding the characters of Bertrande de Rols, Martin Guerre, Arnaud du Tihl, and their associates within a web of social context. Davis draws heavily on the traditional Coras narrative, but also supplements