Judicial Review Essay

Sort By:
Page 1 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Review

    • 2674 Words
    • 11 Pages

    controversy of judicial review which at extreme points, is called judicial activism, is a concept new to India. Judicial review can be defined as the judiciary, in the exercise of its own independence, checking and cross checking the working of the other organs of the government, while trying to uphold the ideal of ‘the rule of law’. Judicial activism more reformist in character is often confused with judicial review. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, judicial activism is “a philosophy of judicial decision-making

    • 2674 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Decent Essays

    JUDICIAL REVIEW IN INDIA Meaning Judicial Review is the power of the judiciary to review the actions taken by the legislature and the executive organ of the government and decide whether or not the actions taken by the legislature and the executive are in conformity with the Constitution. If the enactments done by the legislature and the executive are found unconstitutional then the judiciary has the power to declare those acts illegal, unconstitutional and invalid ( null and void) after which they

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Review Essay

    • 2740 Words
    • 11 Pages

    JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE INDIAN COURTS Introduction Judicial Review is basically an aspect of judicial power of the state which is exercised by the courts to determine the validity of a rule of law or an action of any agency of the state. The courts have the power of testing the validity of legislative as well as other governmental action with reference to the provisions of the constitution. The judiciary tries to undo the harm that is being done by the legislature and executive and they also try

    • 2740 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judicial review is the idea that the actions of the executive and legislative branches of government are subject to review and possible invalidation by the judicial branch, most commonly the Supreme Court. It allows the Supreme Court to take an active role in ensuring that the other branches of government abide by the constitution, as they interpret the document. This process is paramount in protecting the validity of the Constitution as well as upholding the laws set forth by it as well. Judicial

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Science Essay Monsoon Semester 2014 Submitted by- Pradyumna Soni 214048 JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE INDIAN COURTS Introduction Judicial Review is basically an aspect of judicial power of the state which is exercised by the courts to determine the validity of a rule of law or an action of any agency of the state. The courts have the power of testing the validity of legislative as well as other governmental action with reference to the provisions of the constitution. The

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judicial review does not serve the interest of the people. It serves the interest of the political designer. The political designer is interested in maintaining power at all cost. When political actors are in a society where only they are dominant they are not concerned with tactics to secure their political views or to try prevent an opposing party from gaining too much power. Dominant parties anticipate continued success while opposing political forces cannot confidently predict that either party

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Better Essays

    JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL SUPREMACY: A PARADIGM OF CONSTITUTIONALISM IN NIGERIA. By A.T.Shehu, PhD( ABSTRACT This paper examines judicial review and judicial power in Nigeria under the 1999 Constitution in relation to the constitution itself and in relation to the political branches of government. This is essentially to locate where lays supremacy between the branches and the judiciary particularly the Supreme Court with its final appellate jurisdiction. Judicial review and supremacy of the

    • 15519 Words
    • 63 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The judicial review is the convention concealed by the executive and legislative activities which are liable for the judiciary to look over. Particular courts that have judicial review authority must repeal the demonstrations of the state. This happens when it discovers them inconsistent with a higher power. Judicial review is a case of the detachment of forces in a present day administrative framework. This rule is translated diversely in distinctive wards, so the method and extent of judicial review

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    case that they play a very big part in the public’s policy making. Judicial review is the primary role of the federal courts to discuss back and forth if a law is unconstitutional. Judicial review can also regulate the acts or behaviors that the Executive and Judicial carry out in legislation and the Courts may choose to declare those actions taken by the other branches or not those actions are unconstitutional or not. Judicial review is also the main source of power in the Supreme court 's. It has

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judicial review is defined as the procedure where a court is able to review an individual or organisation(s) appeal who feel that they have been a victim of prejudice and where individuals can challenge a decision made. A judge can then review the legitimacy of a decision made by a public body, where it can be disputed that it challenges the way a decision was made. Therefore, judicial review is simply concerned with whether the right laws were applied to the right cases and situations, thus being

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
Previous
Page12345678950