Lao Tzu Essay

The ancient Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu said that,” A leader is best when people barely know he exists; when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: we did it ourselves.” (Shinagle, 2013). The importance of a leader in among people cannot be underestimated. The paradox of Lao Tzu’s words is only an indication of how someone who is traditionally inclined to be at the helm of affairs is subdued and assumes the position of the least represented. To be a leader, Robert GreenLeaf said, a person

“There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow men; true nobility is being superior to your former self.” Lao Tzu LEADING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE In my first year leadership paper in which I was expected to reflect on the various ethical systems used by a leader in decision making, I tried to explain how I got the inspiration to be a leader and hit on some important

grows on and a new era emerges. When comparing The Qualities of the Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli and Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching by Lao-Tzu, both men have very different opinions and strategies to lead their people. Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli have dissimilar opinions on war and military matters, the good qualities of a leader, and the nature of their people. When Lao-Tzu approaches a problem or an issue, he allows the majority of the problem to take its course and fix itself and let the good come out

Confucianism are two primary Chinese ways of thinking. Historically, these two philosophies have been viewed as polar opposites, but upon further research, they have the same mission. The belief system of Taoism viewed in Tao Te Ching, written by Lao Tzu, is the monistic belief that human kind has a connection to the universe, and the “way” controls your life and everything that you do. The “way” has a pre-determined plan for your life, and you must sit back and follow it. On the other hand, Confucianism

they think is right. They have to think about the people as a whole and do what’s best for them. Lao-Tzu Master and Machiavelli’s Prince can be compare through: they’re both powerful, their superior to others, and both want the best for their countries.

parties have held different points of view on different topics such as health care. However an effective government is also based on a how a leader governs the country. Lao Tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher, and Niccolo Machiavelli, in The Prince, an Italian philosopher, present ideas that are very contradictory to each other. Lao Tzu appears liberal as a master who will not control the people while Machiavelli states a prince must emerge and take control of his people. Although both appear to be

Ruling a country effectively is executed through a variety of methods. Lao-Tzu, a follower of Taoism, expresses his belief on the most efficient way to govern. "The more prohibitions you have, the less virtuous people will be. The more weapons you have, the less secure people will be. The more subsidies you have, the less self-reliant people will be" (25). This quote from Lao-Tzu can be interpreted many different ways. The author discusses what he feels the role of a leader should be

deeply loved by someone gives you strength while loving someone deeply gives you courage” (Lao Tzu). Lao Tzu is a Chinese philosopher who lived in the sixth century B.C and his work has embraced by both various anti-authoritarian movements. This quote interacts with the ancient text “Tao Te Chin” because they both describe love have a strength and that strength allows the leader to encounter challenges. Tzu believed if masters are the love by his people is the best ruler because the leader gain strength

strong ideas about leaders were Lao-Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli. Lao-Tzu lived in the sixth century and was believed to have worked for the Chou dynasty. He left the Chou dynasty and began writing about his ideas. Some of his writing became the basis for the religion of Taoism. One of these writings, Tao-te Ching, has many ideas about government and what it takes to be a great leader. Niccolo Machiavelli

leader. However, that is the catch, what makes a good leader? Niccolo Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” and Lao-Tzu’s “Tao-te Ching” gives some ideas on how a leader should control their government. Although Machiavelli’s and Lao-Tzu’s ideas do not quite go hand and hand, there are some similarities. They both spoke similarly on how people should feel about their leader. Lao-Tzu views one of the best qualities of a leader is being loved by his people. On the other hand, Machiavelli believes