Legal Essays

Paralegal Certificate from City College of San Francisco. In June 2001, Ms. Lewis opened her business to prepare legal paperwork for clients involved in uncontested divorces. She advertises her business in the Daily Journal and the Recorder. She charges no more than $75 for the complete

Today the legal drinking age in the United States is 21 which was increased from the age of 18. On July 17, 1984 President Ronald Reagan signed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. This law ordered states to increase the legal age but each state was free to say no. If they didn’t increase the age limit they would lose 10% of its federal funding for highway public transportation. There were several states that initially declined but by 1988 every state passed the law to increase the minimum

living today, the legal drinking age has always been set at twenty-one. In the 1980’s, it rose from eighteen to twenty-one in an attempt to reduce the amount of underage drunk driving accidents. While the number of traffic fatalities have declined over the past few decades, many would argue that the law has spawned many new problems as well, such as an increase in alcohol poisoning deaths and binge drinking. As previously stated, the primary reason for adjustment to the legal drinking age was to

Legal Drinking Age In the United States the legal drinking age is 21 years old, while quite drastically all over the world the drinking ages in many countries are 18. If these countries have lower drinking ages and statistically better education scores and crime rates it could be beneficial for the government to lower the drinking age from 21 to 18, or it may be detrimental to the society. Historically the minimum drinking age for the country was 21 due to the fact that after the 21rst amendment

Introduction This article discusses the conceptions of legal normativity, both moral and “strictly legal” conceptions. According to Spaak, regarding the normative force of legal justification, legal positivists can still embrace the moral idea and not be in conflict with their generally held belief in the “strictly legal” concept of law. In Torben Spaak’s opinion, there is a reason to desire legal positivism; he explains this through introducing the concept of jurisprudence. When discussing

Fuller would probably have cited Iraq under Saddam Hussein as a good example of a society that violated the rule of law so much that it really had no genuine legal system at all. But Fuller does not go as far as Augustine or Aquinas, as he also admits that a society can also have a genuine legal system that satisfies the demands of formal justice (“like cases must be treated alike”) yet still have particular laws that are blatantly unjust. In a society as above, judges are

Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought: Legal Theory On Different Accounts of Positive Law Question One: On what points does Hart critique Austin’s legal positivism? Of Hart’s proposed solutions for the problems he finds in Austin, which is the most important? Why? In The Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence, John Austin asserts that a Positive Law approach to Jurisprudence is to determine the aspects of law that are present within all legal systems. In doing this, Austin hopes to develop an understanding

The corporate veil is defined as a legal concept that separates the personality of a corporation from the personalities of its shareholders, and protects them from being personally liable for the company 's debts and other obligations. The corporate veil is pierced through legal decision which treats the rights or duties of a corporation as the rights or liabilities of its shareholders. There are several circumstances in which the courts will consider piercing the corporate veil: 1) fraudulent representation

In any means, corporation exists independently from its owner and this principle is called the doctrine of separate personality. Doctrine of separate personality is the basic and fundamental principle in a Company Law. This principle outline the legal relationship between company and its members. Company’s assets belong to the company not the shareholders as assets are the equity for creditors. Company must use up all its assets to pay off the creditors if it became insolvent. The same applies to

with Legal Aid in the Canadian Justice System In a 2007 speech by Beverly McLachlin, the Supreme Court of Canada Chief of Justice, she stated that “access to justice promotes social stability” and also that “if people can’t get justice, they will have less respect for the law” (Eberts, 2013). By her words alone, the necessity and importance of legal aid is demonstrated. Socioeconomic status can put individuals at an unfair disadvantage in many aspects of life, especially in regards to legal proceedings