Moral Relativism Essay

said, “We are moving towards a dictatorship of relativism which does not recognize anything as for certain and which has as its highest goal one’s own ego and one’s own desires.” When discussing the idea of Moral Relativism there are conflicting arguments as to if it is true in society or not. As much as Americans wish to ignore it, and although it has negative as well as positive effects, moral relativism is apparent all over the world. Moral Relativism is true and relevant today through individuals

Relativism is the position that all points of view are pretty much as considerable and the individual makes sense of what is certifiable and relative for them. Relativism surmises that truth is various for unmistakable people not simply that assorted people acknowledge differing things to be legitimate. While there are relativists in science and number juggling, moral relativism is the most generally perceived blend of relativism. Practically everyone has heard a relativist trademark: What's a solid

based on feelings as opposed to logic. Moral relativism is the philosophy where things such as ethics, morals and positions of right and wrong are subject to one's own beliefs; this philosophy eliminates all objective truths. Slowly but surely, society is turning into a moral relativistic society where everyone is free to create their own truth based on how they feel. For example, an objective truth would be "The killing of innocent life is wrong," but a moral relativist could just as easily say, "I

amongst societies and academic scholars worldwide. These moral tensions stem from two different competing worldviews – moral absolutism and moral relativism. Absolutists are committed to the existence of a universal set of moral standards that apply to everyone, while relativists believe morality is subject to a person’s own individual choice. There are many reasons as to why moral absolutism is the preferable choice when it comes to making moral decisions. And although both viewpoints include valid

Module 2 Assignment Moral relativism questions whether the the action of a human is good or bad, which determines the character of that person. Cultural relativism is the view that all beliefs come from their cultural surroundings, and that every culture has their own way of “right and wrong”. Individual relativists believe that moral obligations depend on your own beliefs rather than the culture you belong to. 2) In Xenophanes opinion , cultures see their gods in a similar shape as themselves

important aspect of life and majority of our actions are dependent on doing what is moral or immoral. Moral relativism is the theory that defines whether an action is considered moral or immoral. There are two forms of moral relativism, cultural relativism and individual relativism, which are two theories about the morality of our actions. The two theories of moral relativism provide a reasoning for the justification of moral or immoral actions. However, these theories also present various contradictions

Cultural relativism is self-explanatory in its name but goes deeper beyond that. Cultural relativism states that standards are relative to one’s culture. There are no standards of morality shared by all societies; all rules are controlled by the society in which a person lives. If the moral code of a culture says that an action is right than according to those standards, the action is right. If the society says that a certain action is wrong, without any input from other cultures, the action is wrong

whether they think a sitution or in this case a scenario is right or wrong then you are going to recieve to very different answers,becasue one person believes in relativism which means that there is nothing to morality except the beliefs of each culture, and the otherer beleves in objectivism which means that we can be wrong about certain morals. Using the scenario of a group of people sneaking up on someone and beating them up just for the fun of it and asking these two different people then you are

in the terms of various cultures and moral relativism; one must understand Moral Relativism and various cultures. “Moral Relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint and that no stand point is uniquely privileged over all others.” (Westacott) As an example for better understanding if a person says “you have your way, I have my way; as for the right way, it does not exist.” That is moral relativism. We live in a world where the person

have different moral codes. Cultural relativism claims that ethics is relative to individuals, groups, cultures and societies. Relativism resists universal moral normal. The moral code of society determines what is right or wrong in that society. There’s no objective standard that can be used to judge one’s society code against another. Its arrogant to judge others cultures. We should always be tolerant of them. Cultural relativism for many people is a response to the complexity of moral issues and the