Nietzsche Essays

Both Pascal and Nietzsche believe there are several endorsements one should take to to make our lives significance before our time comes to leave the universe. Pascal and Nietzsche may have some similarities passed on their philosophical publications, yet also differences. Nietzsche promotes that there is a universe, which it is unchanged after men live and eventually die out. With this being said Nietzsche contributes with that ideal and expounds the concept of “Truth “and “Lies”, while Pascal justifies

Friedrich Nietzsche and Mahatma Gandhi, two mammoth political figures of their time, attack the current trend of society. Their individual philosophies and concepts suggest a fundamental problem: if civilization is so diseased, can we overcome this state of society and the sickness that plagues the minds of the masses in order to advance? Gandhi and Nietzsche attain to answer the same proposition of sickness within civilization, and although the topic of unrest among both may be dissimilar, they

Nietzsche is primary criticism of morality is not one of morality itself but of how people people think of morality, and of the dominant morality of the time. He dislikes the idea of supplying a “rational foundation for morality,” (Nietzsche 80) because it assumes morality itself to be one fixed entity. Instead, he recommends the preparation of a typology of morals for different contexts, because the same actions can be more or less virtuous depending on one’s situation. Nietzsche, then, would call

Friedrich Nietzsche was a man built upon contradictions. So much in fact, that one could argue him to be both one of the most anti-democratic thinkers and one of the most democratic thinkers of our time. If one attempts to read Nietzsche’s works as a whole, you may undoubtedly be persuaded that he is one of the most anti democratic political theorists in the modern era because of his insistence upon the need of a hierarchical, aristocratic society and his anti-equality stance on the relationship

Nietzsche, as his title of the book “Genealogy of Morality” shows, denies the abrupt beginning or origin of morality. Just like human beings, he believes that morality evolves through history. The world, especially the West, is largely based on the Christian norms and values, and philosophers, starting from Plato to Kant, strived to find morality beyond the reality. They created and perceived another world where God exists and placed morality on the same board. Morality is an edict comes from God

Nietzsche and the Prophet According to Friedrich Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra, the meaning of human existence is to make room for the “Superman”: a superhuman who perseveres in its capacity for unlimited self-creation. (Pg. 49)[1] In order for humankind to embrace its self-creative nature and allow for the transcendence into this superhuman condition, however, we must first learn to destroy our present tables of values; it is our desperate adherence to traditional (religious) values

“Nietzsche on Judeo-Christian Morality” In Nietzsche’s aphorisms 90-95 and 146-162 he attacks what he believes to be the fundamental basis of the “slave” morality prevalent in the Judeo-Christian tradition as well as other religions and societies. From the beginning, he distinguishes the two different types of moralities he believes to exist: the “master morality”, created by rulers of societies, and the “slave” morality, created by the lowest people in societies. The former stresses virtues

Philosophies of Friedrich Nietzsche Friedrich Nietzsche was a 19th-century German philosopher and held in regard amongst the greatest philosophers of the early part century. He sharpened his philosophical skills through reading the works of the earlier philosophers of the 18th century such as Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Arthur Schopenhauer and African Spir; however, their works and beliefs were opposite to his own. His primary mentor was Author Schopenhauer, whose belief was that reality was

was Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche’s faith, like Kierkegaard’s, was at one time rooted in Christianity. However, Kierkegaard remained embedded in his faith and Nietzsche abandoned his. Nietzsche’s existentialism had many of the same beliefs as Kierkegaard’s such as – both believed that philosophy should be based on the value of people’s beliefs and that people had to find their own way in life and decide for themselves what the meanings of life and existence are (Cline, 2011). Nietzsche was concerned

Nietzsche and Kierkegaard are both considered to be the top existentialists for solely different reasons, as well as being very different from each other. They have different philosophies when it comes to their thoughts on religion and it is important to see exactly how they line up in this regard. The best way to do this is to start from the beginning of each’s work, their history and how they grew into their respective roles in their fields. It is also important to note exactly what existentialism