Nuclear Proliferation Essay

The Iranian Nuclear Test Crisis has recently created multiple security issues which need to be properly addressed. As part of the NSC staff, I recommend a strategy in response to this Iranian Nuclear Test Crisis that is consistent with both US policy and the state of international affairs. This strategy will integrate the use of Instruments of Power (IOPs) as well as explain which international relations (IR) perspectives influenced my decision on choosing these specific IOPs. When building a

no way to enforce this because the superpowers involved in making the treaty are also the ones with the stockpile of nuclear weaponry along with no agency to enforce these rules. They claim that their intention is to "facilitate the cessation of the manufacture of nuclear weapons, the liquidation of all their existing stockpiles, and the elimination from national arsenals of nuclear weapons and the means of their delivery... And complete disarmament under strict and effective international control"(Treaty)

States over Iran’s quest to acquire nuclear weapons has led to different ideas and proscriptions to solve the problem. In one particular quote, an unknown speaker advocates that it is in the best interest of the United States and its allies to strike Iran if diplomacy fails, calling this the most prudent option. This controversial idea must be considered not only in its short-term effects, but also in the long-term result. Although it may be tempting to use nuclear weapons and long-range missiles to

Cohl Turnquist Force plays a large role in how countries go about their international relations. A state with the ability to threaten force against other nations has a significant advantage over other states who do not have those same capabilities. Terrorism can be difficult to define, but the text attempts to specify terrorism from other acts of violence. The threat of terrorism is something that needs to be addressed by all nations. The ramifications of terrorism can be serious and can damage

President Trump’s decision to decertify the Iran nuclear deal is profoundly unwise and against national interests. Even those who initially opposed it are now convinced that pulling out of it would be ill-advised. On July 14, 2015, Iran entered into the JCPOA agreement with the P5+1 to regulate Iran’s nuclear program. Though the agreement fosters a sunset clause which allows Iran to open its currently closed avenues to nuclear capability in ten years, it is important to acknowledge that Iran has

Military power functions as an integral part of the national security process and takes up important roles like aggrandizement and defense. Robert Art, in his 1980 article enumerates four core functions of the military, to include: defense, deterrence, compulsion, and posturing. As a defensive object of national security, the military’s first duty is to protect the nation against all enemies of the nation by warding off attacks or minimizing the damage caused by the attack. As a tool for deterrence

The Agency of Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (OPANAL) is one international organizations involved with Guatemala. But to keep this organization alive and well, there are a few points that established OPANAL’s representation. Firstly, is how did OPANAL form. Secondly, what was the purpose of OPANAL. Thirdly, what other countries OPANAL belong to. Fourthly, what if any, measures have OPANAL taken to enforce their rules or guidelines. Finally, how does OPANAL influence international relations with countries

strategic and economic interest. Financial reasons are believed to triggering Chinese WMD transfer while some decentralized firms may even have transferred WMD without the permission of the central government. And despite a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Missile Technology Control Regime and others, it is remarkable China still provides WMD to other states either directly or routed through a third country. Furthermore, Iran also signed the Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention and

Nuclear Weapons: Useless Investments for Security in the 21st Century Since their invention nuclear weapons consist the most destructive and lethal weapons of the world history. But having a nuclear weapon stockpile does not necessarily provides an ultimate immunity against security threats. Despite its theoretical deterrence, using one of them is a highly contested issue. Even under extraordinary circumstances, such as massive terrorist attacks or conventional wars which are more likely than any

NUCLEAR ARMS RACE IN SOUTH ASIA AND ITS IMPACT ON REGIONAL SECURITY INTRODUCTION 1. The nuclear age opened during World War II with a blinding light; a deafening roars fire and blood. The world’s first nuclear bomb exploded at Alamogordo on 16 July 1945. It had a very complex history. The sensational discovery of nuclear fission first came in Germany in December 1938. British research then showed that the manufacture of a nuclear weapon was almost possible. The American technological, scientific