Ontological Argument Essay

Anselm. St. Anselm argued that a perfect being is necessary for existence. His argument is even prior to nature. St. Anselm thought it was impossible for anyone to reason about God or God’s existence without already believing in him. St. Anselm started the Ontological Argument based upon the nature of being. The Ontological Argument states that God is “the greatest being conceivable”. Anselm also said that if we imagine two objects both identical, but one

religion. St. Anselm was the Archbishop of Canterbury, and a passionate philosopher. Anselm was most famous for his Ontological Argument.This is a Philosophical study of religion argument that helps prove the existence of God. His argument concludes to God existing in reality. He confirmed his position through his extremely strong faith and logic. I believe that The Ontological Argument is the best way to prove God’s existence. Anselm believed that God is the best possible thing, that we as humans

One of the criticisms of the ontological argument is by the monk Gaunilo. Gaunilo tries to use the same concept of Anselm’s argument to refute the claims he made. He tries to use the analogy of “The Perfect Island”. (1) A perfect island is an island after which nothing greater exist. (2)The perfect island exists in the mind. (3)The perfect islands exist in the mind and not in reality and can be conceived to exist. (4)To exist is better than not exist. Therefore, the perfect islands exist. Gaunilo’s

The ontological argument was thought of by Anselm of Canterbury. It is a priori argument, meaning that it is based on deductions and self propositions. The main issues concerned with the ontological argument is that once you have an idea of what God is in your mind, and what kind of being God is, can you see that it is impossible for God not to exist? Anselm defined God as "that than which nothing greater can be thought". He said that it is logically absurd to think that such a being does not exist

It is important to note that the ontological argument for the existence of God indicates a priori argument- independent of knowledge- and a deductive argument, whereby logic precedes the notion of evidence or experience. Furthermore, an analytic proposition was used by Anselm to indicate that ‘God exists’- a statement to be true by definition –where the concept of God includes the concept of existence. Dissimilarly, a synthetic proposition adds to our comprehension- in this case we require experience

I will begin my paper by discussing the two major versions of the ontological argument by Anselm presented in the proslogion. The first being “Possible and actual existence”, and the second being “Contingent or Necessary”. One should start off with the first summarized in the standard form as follows: #1 It is a conceptual truth that God is a being than which none greater can be imagined. #2 God exists as an idea in the mind. #3 A being that exists as an idea in the mind and in reality is, other

A. In Proslogion, the ontological argument made by Anselm can be summarized in the following way: 1. God is the greatest thing to be conceptualized/thought. a. “Lord… You are something than which nothing greater can be thought.” 2. In our mind God exists. 3. We know that a being that exists both in reality and in our mind is greater than a being that only exists in our mind. 4. If the being we conceptualize exist only in our mind, then it is not the greatest being. a. “For if it exists only in

The Ontological Argument The Ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. "Ontological" literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. The main component of the Ontological argument can be found in the Anselm’s "Proslogion" which is a short work that tries to demonstrate both the existence and the nature of God. His main aim in writing the Proslogion is not to directly prove the existence of

The Ontological Argument is a deductive argument in that it endeavors to demonstrate that its premises lead to a logical conclusion which can't be doubted. For this situation, rationalists have endeavored to demonstrate that the expression 'God Exists' is an analytic proclamation in that it is logically incomprehensible for it not to be the situation, generally as it is outlandish for a lone wolf to not be an unmarried man. This sort of argument is known as 'from the earlier' on the grounds that

St. Anselm's Ontological Argument has remained one of the most widely-known arguments for a Christian God, as well as simply probably the most famous logical proof of all time, since its inception in the late 11th century. The economical proof uses deductive logic starting from basic given premises to lead the reader to what is meant to be the inevitable conclusion that God must, necessarily, exist. The argument's polished simplicity is both a point in favor and a problem, however, for it provides