Ontological Argument Essay

of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God The ontological argument for the existence of God was originally set out in eleventh century by St. Anselm in his Proslogian. Anselm was a Benedictine monk, Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the great medieval theologians. It has received a lot of both support and criticism from leaning philosophers. The argument is appeals to those who already believe in the existence of God than to an atheist. The argument is entirely

Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument In a world of scientific inquiry, atheism, and the assassination of God, we are often neglectful of our Glorious God’s existence. With new theories of neuropsychology, quantum physics, gene therapy, evolution, and psychobiology, we are constantly forced to edge God out of our lives, to be replaced with cold, empty scientific thought. What, with meme theory, genetic predisposition, evolutionary spontaneous generation

Number - SYBSAM001 Course code - PHI1024F Course Lecturer – Dean Chapman Tutor – Kajal Carr Does the Ontological Argument successfully show that God exists? God – “a being of which nothing greater can be conceived.” (Blackburn, S, 1999. Think. New York United States of America, Oxford University Press Inc. 5:154) The ontological argument put forward by St Anselm, is based on this definition. The argument, Anselm’s premises, the concept of god being understood, god existing in the understanding and god

1. A fallacy is an argument with some sort of mistaken proponent that makes the argument unsound. One such fallacy is the genetic fallacy. A genetic fallacy is when a claim is declared false or invalid not due to the integrity of the argument but from the source, such as a group or business. An example of a genetic fallacy would be if Dasani put out a claim that their water was the purest and that claim was discredited not because of their claim being false, but that it came from Dasani themselves

Anselm 's Ontological Argument on the existence of God. I will begin by presenting Anselm’s Ontological Argument from the ground up. This includes the argument, basic idea, initial assumptions, Anselm’s definition of god, and Anselm 's distinctions which are needed to completely understand the nature of my argument. Furthermore, I will present concepts of logic and define what makes an argument valid, and circular argument because they are necessary for understanding the validity of this argument. Following

1. The Ontological Argument An argument not based on observation, instead on the reason itself. It is derived from the study of being (which is obviously - ontology) The first person to propose this theory is St.Anselm, where his argument can be summarized as follows: a) God is the greatest being that we ever know. b) If God doesn’t truly exist in reality = There’s a greater being out there c) But… there isn’t another greater person than God d) Therefore, God exists On the contrary to Anselm’s

Many different philosophers have argued the existence of God in the form of ontological arguments. The first philosopher to make such argument is Saint Anselm of Canterbury. St. Anselm argued that God is “something than which nothing greater can be imagined” (Barnes). He believed that there was nothing in this world whose existence and understanding could be imagined to be greater than the existence of God and that even a fool would agree that there is something in this universe in which nothing

Anselm’s “Ontological Argument” The general idea of the ontological argument is based on the notion that the concept of God as the greatest being implies that God exists—if not, there could be something greater, namely an existent greatest being—but this being would be God. The structure of the Ontological Argument can be outlined as follows (The argument is based on Anselm's Proslogion 2): 1. We conceive of God as a being than which no greater can be conceived. 2. This being than which no greater

the existence of God. These theories are the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, and the teleological argument. St. Anselm of eleventh century, and Descartes of seventeenth century, have used the ontological argument for proving the existence of God. The God, for them, is supreme, "needing nothing outside himself, but needful for the being and well-being of all things." (Pg. 305). St Anselm’s account of the ontological argument for the existence of God deals with the ‘existence

Of the three theistic arguments presented by the text, I find the “design”, or the teleological argument to be the most persuasive because unlike the other two arguments (ontological and first cause), the argument’s premises can be supported through observations of the physical world. The ontological and first cause argument are both more based in pure logic and reasoning, and they also can both be easily challenged for the same reason. On the other hand, the design argument focuses less on how the