Ontological Argument Essay

without definitive proof of it's existence. Within this essay I will be addressing the topic of the existence of God, I will examine proofs such as the Ontological Argument and Cosmological Argument. In doing so testing its advantages while also providing contradictory arguments as posed by philosophers such as Kant and Hume. The first ontological argument for the proof of Gods existence was posed by St.Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109 C.E), he reasons the existence of God from the idea of "a being than

Within Part 9 of Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779), Hume has the character of Demea present an Ontological Argument for the existence of God. Demea attempts to argue that God’s existence can be proven wholly a priori and logically, rather than through the a posteriori design argument. A priori arguments say that if the reasoning is valid then the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises, which Demea argues is the case when it comes to the existence of god. The following

a benevolent God they do not need science to show proof that he exists because of their morals and beliefs they have been raised to follow. In this paper I will prove that God does exist by explaining the ontological, cosmological, and design argument. The ontological argument was an argument created by Saint Anselm. Anselm argued that if we thought about what God is and what he can do then we know he must exist. What Anselm means by this is that if our minds can think of something so great like

Ontological Argument Anselm’s ontological argument states that: • We define God as the greatest of all conceived beings. • A being that is necessary is greater than a being that is not necessary. • If God exists as an idea, but not in reality, then we can imagine something greater than Him. • If God is a perfect being, we cannot imagine a being greater than Him. • Thus, if God exists in the mind as an idea, then God necessarily exists in reality. In Anselm’s argument, necessary existence means

The question of the existence of God has troubled mankind for thousands of years. Many philosophers and theologians have always searched for prove whether God exists. Many of them constructed valid arguments which support theist believes. The existence of God was once never denied, as His presence, His existence was evident in miracles and the people 's faith. But time and the advancement of modern science have called God and His very nature into question. The Perfect Being has become the source

Descartes Cosmological and Ontological arguments are well organized and are perceived as valid. However, these arguments may be found valid only if we follow the rules of Descartes premises through deductive reasoning. The soundness of Descartes Ontological and Cosmological arguments are questioned in this paper as I argue against Descartes axioms. Descartes bases his proofs of God on specific propositions and his own claims of knowledge. The lack of proof behind his premises is why I cannot except

cultures believe in all kinds of stuff, for example some people believe that the sun is a god, some religions believe in many gods, even thousands. The point I am trying to make here is that everybody believes in something. The Ontological argument is a philosophical argument trying to prove the existence of God, by

The nature of this question is pointing towards ontological arguments, these arguments claim that understanding God’s definition to be true can prove His existence. The proof used is a priori and this means that the propositions do no not require sense experience to be understood as true. The name ontological is taken from two Greek words, ‘ontos’ (being) and ‘logos’ (study of) which shows that the argument is concerned with the nature of God, and it is from His nature that His existence is argued

The two readings I will be discussing are: the five ways and the “ontological” argument. In the five ways, St. Thomas explains the five ways in which God’s existence can be proven. His first justification is motion. Since nothing is able to move itself and the process of movement cannot go on indefinitely, the first mover must be God. The second explanation is the nature of efficient causality. There is always a first efficient cause, which is God. The reason for this is because without a first efficient

Ontological Argument One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an all-perfect God is the ontological argument. Ontological arguments are arguments to prove the existence of God based on pure reason alone. They attempt to show that we can deduce God’s existence from, so to speak, the very definition of God. St. Anselm of Canterbury proposed the first and most well known ontological argument in 1078 in his Proslogion, but it was actually Immanuel Kant, an 18th century German philosopher