Ontological Argument Essay

The Ontological Argument In my view, the belief that the mere concept of God carries real existence with it is sound. I would deploy the same argument as a cogent proof of the existence of God. The belief of a greater perfect being is what brings forth this argument. This idea is seen in most religions all over the world, the existence of God , except in atheism which denies the existence of a supreme being. As proof, I bring forth Descartes claim in the Fifth Meditation in which he demonstrates

weaknesses, through criticising existing arguments from various philosophers and thereby determine that the ontological argument which states God exists in both the human mind and in reality, is a strong statement. The analytic statement, which St Anselm devised, indicates that even atheist who does not believe in God also approves of his theory of God. I will evaluate the deductive, ontological arguments on the existence of God and thus state how the ontological argument, which I have accepted, rationally

An Ontological argument is one that uses reason to prove the existence of God instead of using observations. Similarly a cosmological argument makes conclusions from facts about the world to prove the existence of God. (Oppy) Dr. William Lane Craig’s cosmological argument of Kalam has many supporter and opponents on his argument of God existence. Dr. William Lane Craig is a Christian man born in 1949 in Illinois. He has studied philosophy and theology at many universities, holds a doctorate in

attempts to prove the existence of God. The argument he presents in the Third Meditation for the existence of God has been nicknamed the ‘Trademark’ argument. This argument deals with types of ideas, of which there are three, a principle called the Causal Adequacy principle, and a sliding scale of reality. The argument concludes that the idea of a God that is a perfect being is an innate idea that is real and was caused by God and therefore God is real. This argument will be explained with the greater detail

doubtful. The ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments supporting the existence of God do not provide empirical evidence that can be decisively attributed to a deity of any sort. The ontological argument proposed by Anselm in which God can be proven to exist through reasoning alone is flawed. Unlike the argument suggests, you cannot simply think something into existence by ascribing that thing with the property of existence as Immanuel Kant pointed out. The cosmological argument is more sound

proving the existence of god, and from this has sprouted many arguments attempting to prove or disprove god’s existence from a wide variety of different perspectives. St. Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury has proved a true pioneer in the study of the philosophy of religion. Anselm provided one of the most crucial and influential solutions to solving the mystery of god’s existence, the Ontological Argument. While there were many different arguments (along with their originators) discussed during the religion

misconstrued. Through the duration of this paper I will discuss two arguments on the existence of God, and the premises and versions that follow both of these arguments. On the basis of God’s existence, we must consider all options. Whether It’s a matter of belief, personal experience with God, or whatever factual evidence you discover to back up one’s argument, there are many different standpoints to take on the matter at

In the Medieval Sourcebook for Anselm’s 1033-1009 Proslogium, Aselm constructs an argument in which it is a deductive ontological argument. Aselm attempts to prove the existence of God through one single argument which is that God does truly exist. However, there will always be dilemmas, conflicts or predicaments when it comes to such sensitive and personal topics such as the existence of God. Atheists are types of people who do not believe in the existence of God and have been continuously denying

The Ontological Argument was proposed by a man named St. Anselm in which he used this argument to prove this existence of God by utilizing an a priori reasoning. The argument does not provide any kind of physical evidence, but instead the argument is made through thoughts and logic. The ontological argument takes the idea of God to show that God must exist in understanding according to Anselm. In other words, Anselm suggests that the greatest conceivable being must exist because that being must

As surely as the possibility of God’s existence is self-evident to mankind, so it seems is the possibility of His non-existence. While virtually every culture throughout history has believed in at least one deity, the arguments for and against the existence of Christianity’s God have raged on for centuries. In his Institutes, John Calvin argued that God planted the knowledge of His existence in the heart of every man, saying: That there exists in the human mind, and indeed by natural instinct, some