Operant Conditioning Essay

The section of this Chapter that I found to be interesting was Operant Conditioning. It was interesting how we can train and produce a behavior that is more probable to recur with positive and negative reinforcements. When we are presented with a positive reinforcer, "we strengthen the probability that a response will recur" (pg 114). For example, when we are training a dog to do tricks, we reward the dog with a treat every time the trick is performed correctly. With negative reinforcers we use

behavioral theory differed for other therapeutic approaches in its application of principles of classical and operant conditioning (p. 233). The classical conditioning refers to “to what happens prior to learning that creates a response through pairing” (Corey, 2016, p. 235). A key figure in this learning theory is Pavlov, who conducted the famous dog’s experiment. The classical conditioning involves a particular unconditioned stimulus that produces a specific unconditioned response, and then the original

also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant is a jihadist militant group that follows a fundamentalist doctrine of Islam. (Shirlow, Peter, 2013, para. 3). ISIS uses Operant conditioning to keep their members and possible members thinking that life under ISIS is better than their current state. Operant conditioning is used in ISIS to enforce their own morals and values, and isolate the rest of the world's views to their followers. Finally, ISIS has a ranking system that encourages members

Operant conditioning is considered the second learning principle. This type of learning occurs due to the cause-and-effect relationship between a behavior and its consequences. Operant conditioning has a common sense element. When we reward a behavior, it increases. When we punish a behavior, it decreases (Horvath et.al. 2013). Individuals who dislike particular substances have little risk for developing an addiction to those substances. Such dislikes to certain drugs or substances are not uncommon

extinguished response following presentation of the US in classical conditioning (Bouton & Nelson, 1998). This phenomenon is dependent upon experimental context, as context promotes an association between the CS and US (Bouton, 2004). A lever pressing response was trained in rats to study the context-dependency of extinction and reinstatement in operant conditioning. The current study demonstrates that reinstatement occurs in operant conditioning, and remains context dependent, as reinstatement only occurred

Two-process theory and on one process theory are two theories that describe avoidance. The two-process theory incorporates the use of operant conditioning and Pavlovian classical conditioning, which differs in one-process theory because that theory only involves operant conditioning. The two-process theory suggests that escaping is the way to learning, which is may confuse people because it is classified as a theory of avoidance. The term “escape” is used to better describe the theory because

Classical conditioning can be explained through humans best kept secret; urinating in the shower. Though many deny, the sound of running water typically elicits the natural response to urinate. After awhile, it is common to become conditioned to associate a shower (without the water on) with the urge to urinate. Thus, classical conditioning is a learned association between a stimulus (any sight, smell, sound, taste, or touch (like the sound of running water)), and a neutral stimulus (like the shower)

Operant conditioning, also referred to as instrumental conditioning, is a way for modifying behavior (an operant) which in turn utilizes contingencies among a new discriminative stimulus, a great operant result, plus a reinforce to vary your probability of any result taking place all over again in this situation. By means of operant conditioning, a connection is manufactured involving the behavior and an effect with the behavior. Behaviorist B. Y. Skinner, which explains why you may sometimes listen

What is the operant conditioning theory? The operant conditioning theory supports the idea that learning is responsible for the change in behavior. One of the most widely known operant conditioner is B. F. Skinner. He believed that the essential learning principles in operant conditioning are positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, and negative punishment. According to (Troutman & Alberto, 2017), B.F. Skinner began testing this theory by working on animals, preferably

Applying Operant Conditioning to Human Behaviour Operant conditioning is when a way of learning by consequence. To put it basic, an action which is rewarded is more likely to be repeated, along with an action that is punished is less likely to be repeated. To apply this to an example of human behaviour, young children may have shaped behaviour due to operant conditioning; where desireable behaviour is rewarded (e.g. by giving a toy) the behaviour is being positively