Oresteia Essay

The Judgment of Athena in Oresteia Athena resolves the conflicts of the Oresteia with an ambiguous judgment that seems to satisfy all parties involved. However, in any conflict, at least one party must make sacrifices to work toward a resolution. Athena achieves her paradoxical result by misleading Apollo to think that he has received total victory in judgment and by offering compensatory powers to the Erinyes, thus creating an illusion of satisfaction for all amidst a reality of compromise

4 Life Lessons From Aeschylus's Oresteia Greek tragedy contains valuable life advice. Revenge! Faster, Kill, Kill! Aeschylus (525-455 BC) retells a story first made popular by Homer. What develops in “Oresteia”’s three tragedies – “Agamemnon”, “The Libation Bearers” and “The Eumenides” could be the plot of “Revenge! Faster, kill, kill!”, but behind all this fun stuff philosophical questions peek out. Beyond the stories told in ancient tragedies, there are topics that were of interest and dispute

In the Oresteia three main key points that are family, fate, and nets. The significance of each point is Important to the story individually but the way they intertwine is what dives the out come of the stories plot. The three terms together are like a cause and effect. If you look at Agamemon's his actions involving his family, lead to the gods create his faith, which leads his to be stuck in a net/web of chaos. It begins with Agamemnon's father killing his brothers children's and feed them to him

Aeschylus’s trilogy, The Oresteia, presents one reason for Clytemnestra murdering Agamemnon: as revenge for the sacrificial murder of her daughter, Iphigenia. While this is not the only reason for Clytemnestra’s action, it is the most ambiguous; for example, Clytemnestra presents herself as a devoted mother, but she constantly contradicts her actions with her words. For instance, Clytemnestra, acting as a loving mother, vowed to avenge her daughter’s death, but later on goes to curse her own son

Aeschylus’s Oresteia illustrates justice as being subjective and evolves throughout the plays to become increasingly complex. In Agamemnon, justice is synonymous with revenge and seen as simply being part of fate. The Chorus highlights this when they say, “Fate is grinding sharp the sword of Justice” and go on to relate that as long as Zeus exists this is simply a fact of life (1565). The idea of revenge as justice is also seen in the Chorus’ description of “the plunderer plundered” and “Each charge

Throughout the three plays of the Oresteia, justice takes many different shapes and forms as various characters attempt to justify their otherwise morally questionable actions. In particular, the Oresteia portrays a transformation from an older, more primitive form of justice, to a new concept of civil justice devised by Athena. Aeschylus emphasizes this contrast between the old and new orders, and the differing philosophies of both—with the older justice of the Furies and Clytemnestra taking on

Euripidide’s The Medea and Aeschylus’ The Oresteia, the chorus acts as a point of relatability for the audience. The chorus is meant to be made up of everyday folk watching the story unfold just as the audience is, and providing feedback or advice to the more prominent characters. The chorus acts as a gauge for Greek opinion, a capsule of how the audience most likely would have reacted while watching these plays. In the case of Euripidide’s The Medea and Aeschylus’ The Oresteia, the chorus is a litmus test especially

Justice and Gender in the Oresteia Justice and gender are put into relation with each other in Aeschylus’ Oresteia. In this trilogy, Greek society is characterized as a patriarch, where the oldest male assumes the highest role of the oikos (household). The household consists of a twofold where the father is the head, and the wife and children are the extended family. The head of the oikos is the only one who possesses the authority to seek justice. This is because the father acquires the authority

Finding Peace Within Justice “If you want peace, work for justice.” – Pope Paul VI. The Oresteia trilogy, which contains the plays Agamemnon, The Libation Bearers, and The Furies, uses justice as its dominant theme. Aeschylus wrote these plays sometime after the end of the Persian wars, around 449 BC, when the star of Athens was on its superiority. It was the commencement of a new era, marked by the establishment of a new social and political order built on democracy and the rule of law. The rule

From fate to justice; how the net imagery in the Oresteia changes throughout the play and how does it establish the superiority of a formal justice system to one based on the individual quest for revenge There is no doubt that the house of Atreus did not have an easy history. However, it made me question the true motives of the actions the characters in the Oresteia perform. Are they a form of justice or revenge? In the system that was practiced throughout the play, revenge drives the characters