Phaedo By Plato Essay

An Analysis of the Distinctions of the Body and the Soul in the Philosophy of Socrates This philosophical study will define the distinctions of the body and the soul as defined in the philosophy of Socrates. In the Phaedo, Socrates defines the important distinction between the ”visible” body and the “invisible” substance of the soul. Socrates defines the temporal and changing nature of the visible body, which is impermanent. In contrast to this view, the soul is a higher form of incomposite energy

famous dialogues Phaedo, Plato touches on some of the theories of Socrates that focus on the immortality of the soul. Plato explains four main arguments that attempt to prove that the soul is indeed immortal. After reviewing and analyzing the arguments given, I have come to the conclusion that Plato’s premises are not true. I believe that the arguments he offers are in some way invalid. In order to prove the validity of each discourse, I will evaluate each of the four arguments Plato presents. Before

Plato is one of the greatest and well known philosophers of all time. Born around 428 BC, Plato grew up in Greece learning from Socrates, another well known philosopher. Later in life, Plato taught Aristotle who was also a well known philosopher. His works of writing and thoughts about life have significantly impacted the Western culture in numerous ways. In selected readings of Plato, he seems to place importance on wisdom, and how to attain wisdom. Plato argues that in order to attain pure knowledge

Phaedo One of the final discussions that Socrates goes of is the journey people take after death. When Socrates takes on this philosophical topic it leads into the description of the soul. In the book, Plato Five Dialogues, translated by G. M. A Grube, Phaedo gives an account of this discussion. Now the question that we want to discuss is, “what is the soul according to the Phaedo”? What makes this a hard question is that Socrates never directly answers this question. Although, according to the

Weirob, who, after a motor vehicular accident, is going to die within a few days and logs the discussion of personal identity and immortality Weirob participates in with a Christian pastor, Miller. Unlike other philosophical dialogues, such as in Phaedo, Perry stays away from including supplementary sections to set the scene or provide a better understanding of how the characters behave. Instead, he cuts directly into the discussion, and uses the dialogue only as a means to an end, in the strictest

Plato's Phaedo Plato's Phaedo is a dialog between Phaedo, Cebes, and Simmias depicting Socrates explanation as to why death should not be feared by a true philosopher. For if a person truly applies oneself in the right way to philosophy, as the pursuit of ultimate truth, they are preparing themselves for the very act of dying. Plato, through Socrates, bases his proof on the immortality of the soul, and it being the origin of our intellect. Several steps must be taken for the soul to be proven

things too wide open for interpretation. Plato’s Phaedo highlights this. Socrates spends most of his time conversing and confining with Cebes and Simmias over the substantial topics of men as property of the gods, and the meaning of true philosophy. Leading to the ultimate question. “Is Socrates ultimate goal to reach heaven?”. Between these two topics I believe Socrates does not quite make sense of what he is trying to persuade. In the book the Phaedo Socrates is located in his jail cell after his

Phaedo is an account of events before and after the death of Socrates as written by Plato in the form of dialogue. This dialogue is an expression of various arguments and beliefs on the theme of mortality. Phaedo was one of the men present to witness the death of Socrates, and before the execution, they had engaged in conversations with which Socrates expressed his ideas on death, the soul, and the belief in the existence of an afterlife. Plato’s philosophical idealism is expressed in Phaedo in some

Furthermore, this fable will not appear anymore in the Phædo since Socrates considered the fables he had been versifying the days before as they did not have any useful purpose. So, just before his students came visiting him, he actually experienced pleasure and pain, and it suggests that the tendency towards abstraction that is often associated with his philosophy must be reconciled with the fact that his inquiries begin here and elsewhere with everyday observations and occurrences. If Socrates

The Ambiguity of Plato For hundreds of years, Plato has been admired as a writer, a master rhetorician, an artist, and above all, a philosopher; however, Plato's backlashes against sophistry and art have led to much confusion concerning his ideas and beliefs. John Poulakos says of Plato, "[F]or most rhetoricians Plato has always played the same role he assigned to the sophists--the enemy" (Nienkamp 1). Plato will always appear to be the skilled rhetorician or artist who speaks out against rhetoric