Phaedrus Essay

Through his works of the Phaedrus, in which Plato’s voice is heard through the mouth of Socrates and The Republic, Plato’s ultimate goal for civilization, the perfect place for society to function together. In these works, Plato demonstrates his dislike for the practice and implementation of rhetoric but also aims at taking sophistry and poetry down along with it. The Phaedrus is the ultimate attack on rhetoric from Plato, and its practices. It follows Socrates and Phaedrus as they discuss love, and

beauty, either in body or in soul. She then described the ascent of eros, discussing forms of love in terms of their nobility. Throughout her speech, Diotima reflected and expanded on notions brought up in previous speeches, particularly those by Phaedrus and Pausanias,

divinity and of eternal life. This search culminates in Socrates, who through his lifelong search for truth gains an image of the soul and eternal life similar to the Catholic concept of eternal life. In the Phaedrus, Socrates says that when all divine souls “go to feast at the banquet”(Phaedrus 247b), they ascend to a place beyond heaven to gaze upon a supreme divine being. Similarly, In his letter to the Hebrews, St. Paul speaks about the mass a copy of the heavenly sanctuary the beatific vision

from truth until Diotima’s speech provides a permanent form in which love “neither waxes nor wanes” (Sym. 211A). Through the speeches, love shifts from identifying with the concrete to the abstract, but still ultimately advances goals of present: Phaedrus sees love as helping “men gain virtue,” Aristophanes as only a “promise” to restore humans to their “original nature” and Pausanias and Eryximachus have to use two changing notions of love (Sym. 180B, 193D). In contrast, Diotima relates love as the

Even though the great philosopher Plato was Aristotle’s teacher, their views on what good rhetoric is or consists of differs. And not only that, the rhetoric that they use to convey those differences greatly differs as well. In Plato’s perspective, the art of speaking is only really art when it holds the truth. His way of thinking derives from the importance he places on virtue. Aristotle’s view on the other hand is based more so on logic. Aristotle is concerned more with the validity of the argument

The centrality and power of love as experienced by humans has led them to write songs throughout the ages. It has also resulted in verses and stories about love which they describe as the indescribable and mysterious force that leads them to the peaks of felicity as well as to the depths of despair. Love is the ultimate human concern. It is also the object of all human striving as well as the universal principle engirdling all human activities (Brent Linge 3). The need to examine and explore love

triumph of his first tragedy. In the Symposium; the guests Phaedrus, an Athenian aristocrat; Pausanias, the legal expert; Eryximachus, a physician; Aristophanes, eminent comic playwright; Agathon ,a tragic poet and host of the banquet; Socrates, eminent philosopher and Plato 's teacher; and Alcibiades, a prominent Athenian statesman, orator and general; discuss their own versions and viewpoints to praise the god of love. First, we have Phaedrus, who starts to say that love is the most ancient of the

live in relation to each other, can connect with that of Phaedrus idea of love. In the Symposium, Phaedrus speaks of love as a great god who gives the greatest goods and there is no greater good given to a boy than a lover. The lover is the guidance, to hold accountable the boy, just as we are held accountable by Jesus. He gives us this commandment of simply loving each other as he loves us and the Father him. Just as the Lover in Phaedrus definition of love, the Lover is guiding the boy to be his

importantly, he also showed how one must be led to understanding and that it cannot be merely preached. In the case of the individual student, she could not write a rhetorical paper until the subject was simple enough for her to understand. Granted, Phaedrus continued to tell his student what to write about, but once she could see how for herself, she no longer needed to be dictated. Working back up and putting the pieces of the problem back together, the students then were in position to decide for

3) In the Phaedrus, Plato discussed the metaphor of the chariot and charioteer. Explain the metaphor and apply the metaphor to today’s society. What/who are the horses and what/who guides the chariot? Why? In the Phaedrus, Plato shares the allegory of the chariot to explain the nature of the human soul or psyche. The chariot is pulled by two winged horses, one mortal and the other immortal. The mortal, black horse is deformed and obstinate. Plato describes the horse as a “crooked lumbering animal