Phaedrus Essay

Jose A. Nunez Introduction to Philosophy 1113 Professor Dr. Sarah Woolvine March 23rd, 2015. Tittle: Analysis of Speeches Given in Praise of Eros on Plato’ Symposium Among the ancient Greek philosophers, Plato was one of the greatest. Known for his remarkable philosophical works, Plato was born into a very prominent Athenian family, and he was expected to have a proliferous political career, but the political scene at that time made Plato devote himself instead to his philosophical inquiry

of Plato, "[F]or most rhetoricians Plato has always played the same role he assigned to the sophists--the enemy" (Nienkamp 1). Plato will always appear to be the skilled rhetorician or artist who speaks out against rhetoric and art. In Apology and Phaedrus we see the character of Socrates rail against writing because it can quickly get out of control of the author and just as easily be misinterpreted, yet Plato is known for his skillful dialogical writing. In

expands on this description of love as being a pursuit of beauty (by which one can attain the goal of love) that culminates in an understanding of the form of beauty. The purpose of this paper is to consider the speeches presented (i.e. those of Phaedrus, Pausanias, Eryximachus, Aristophanes, and Agathon) in Plato 's Symposium as separate parts that assist in an accounting of the definition and purpose of platonic love. Before considering the speeches presented in Plato

Plato and Toni Morrison: Erotic Love Defined Eros, the Greek word for erotic love, is an idea that is well expressed through Plato’s Symposium as well as Love by Toni Morrison. The Symposium discusses the origins and opposing meanings of Eros, whereas Love elaborates more on the two different kinds of love that people exhibit. Plato’s Symposium and Love demonstrate that erotic love is a love that is passionate and difficult to contain and often results in people getting hurt, but is the strongest

In Robert Pirsig’s semi-autobiographical text Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Pirsig shares a real-life experience about a motorcycle journey from Minneapolis to Montana with his son, Chris, and two friends, John and Sylvia. On this trip, they don’t have a precise schedule, but instead they let the uncrowded roads that cars avoid, show them the way. As the bare roads are being traveled upon, the narrator begins to reveal mysterious things about himself, his companions, and his past. The

this description of love as being a pursuit of beauty (by which one can attain the goal of love) that culminates in an understanding of the form of beauty (Dorter, 1969). The purpose of this paper is to consider the speeches presented (i.e. those of Phaedrus, Pausanias, Eryximachus, Aristophanes, and Agathon) in Plato 's Symposium as separate parts that assist in an accounting of the definition and purpose of platonic love. Before considering the speeches presented in Plato 's Symposium it is important

In Robert Pirsig’s autobiographical novel “Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance”, Pirsig shares a real-life experience about a motorcycle journey from Minneapolis to Montana with his son, Chris, and two friends, John and Sylvia. On this trip, they don’t have a precise schedule, but instead they let the uncrowded roads that cars avoid, show them the way. As the bare roads are being traveled upon, the narrator begins to reveal mysterious things about himself, his companions, and his past. The

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance - The Reconciliation of Western and Eastern Philosophy The differences in Western and Eastern philosophy are marked. Eastern thinking has slowly become “discovered” by the West; meanwhile, the development of Western thought and philosophy has come under close scrutiny by modern and postmodern philosophers and thinkers as being flawed at its core. The German philosopher Martin Heidegger came to the conclusion that “Western philosophy is a great error”

distinction between a sophist and a philosopher; sophists were deceivers who only seek to influence others by the use of rhetoric and does not offer true knowledge, and the philosopher was a lover of wisdom who sought truth (Plato Sophist, 233c; Plato Phaedrus, 278d). I argue that Plato was wrong in making this distinction. Plato should not have lumped all sophists into the neo-sophistic basket. He should have recognised that not all sophists during

was presented as normality. One may assume, life had gotten better for everyone after living in an illusion of a perfect reality. Just like a wise philosopher name Phaedrus put it, “Things are not always what they seem; the first appearance deceives many; the intelligence of a few perceives what has been carefully hidden.” Phaedrus was talking about the wonderful art of deception. Deception can be likened to a stick bug. At first glance, it looks like a twig and is carefully hidden. If someone