Philosophy of Science Essay

development are changes. These changes had a tremendous effect in the discipline. Political philosophy continued to progress which affected both political theory and political science. It seems that with the progression of political philosophy, there was a growing need for the the discipline to become more scientific. They wanted it to be based on facts, to become value-free and to be precise. Political philosophy started veering away from the classics. Despite the continuous need to be scientific, there

Watson's Philosophy and Science of Caring Caring is the most important responsibility of a nurse and thus it has to be valued and improved from generation to generation (Watson, 2009). It is an interpersonal practice, which promotes health and individual or family growth (Taylor, 2008). It is also called as the central of nursing (Potter, P., & Perry, A., 2011). Jean Watson is a theorist who mainly focused to the emergence of care to the practice and how to improve the caring process. Jean believes

asked, “what is science?” The answer may seem straightforward: biology, physics, chemistry, etc. However, asking the same question to a philosopher, the answer is completely different. In other words, Philosophers are not asking for a mere list of sciences but, are seeking to answer one specific question: What is it that makes something a science. In further detail, the Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science. Therefore, the

based on how philosophy differs from science and religion. In a way it does not, they are really the same. They just use different terminology in how they discipline is expressed. For example, the scientific method is how the scientist comes to a conclusion, just how philosophers ask certain questions to prove their debates or theories. Religion, on the other hand, is more closely related to philosophy because both deal with beliefs and faith base systems. In the early days of philosophy, philosophers

between a scientific theory and a non-scientific theory in the article “Science as Falsification”. He claims that a scientific finding could be proven to be either true or false. Non-scientific theories include the works of Karl Marx, of Alfred Adler, and of Sigmund Freud. Popper states, “It was rather that I felt that these other three theories, though posing as science, had in fact more in common with primitive myths than with science; that they resembled astrology rather than astronomy” (1). As mentioned

played close attention to the Foreword written by Thomas Kuhn. As a novice in reading about the philosophy of science, the name Kuhn sounded familiar, but I was not able to remember which situations or disciplines were Kuhn’s areas of expertise. Moreover, I was sure that his name was related to philosophy, but I did not certainly know about his contributions to the development of the philosophy of science. Through inquiring more about the connections between Kuhn and Fleck, I have found some research

Gary Hatfield in his article “Psychology, Philosophy and Cognitive Science: Reflections on The History and Philosophy of Experimental Psychology ’’ published in journal of Mind and Language on 3rd June 2002 volume number 17 by Blackwell Publishers focuses on critically examining the views that psychology came into existence in 1879 and how finally it became scientific through the influence of logical empiricism. The article puts forward evidence to justify that there was a conspiracy among the early

of the world through scientific theories is the birth to the philosophy of science (Okasha, 2002). Several perspectives of scientific theories have been postulated by many on the history and philosophy of science. One of such is the Kuhn theory of science development postulated by Thomas Kuhn. His theory brought about a new perspective where

In the three-part informative bibliography “Karl Popper, the enemy of certainty,” published by The Guardian, scientist and philosopher Karl Popper’s perspective on science is identified and discussed. Author Liz Williams describes how Karl Popper was driven by a passion for learning and understanding the world around him, and eventually grew to reject the ideas of empiricism and positivism. Popper states that deductive reasoning, rather than inductive reasoning, should be used to evaluate a theory

A Review of Sandra Harding’s Science and Social Inequality In Science and Social Inequality, Sandra Harding argues that both the philosophy and practices of modern Western science ultimately function to advance global social inequalities. Drawing on feminist, postcolonialist, multicultural, and antiracist critiques of Western science, Harding supports this argument and exposes the ways in which modern Western science engenders social injustices particularly within the contexts of militarism, environmental