Plato Republic Essay

ancient Gods to more in depth works such as Ethics or The Bible. All of these works show serious teachings about multiple things such as justice, Gods, and philosophy. In my paper, I am going to discuss the concepts of Aristotle 's Ethics and Plato 's The Republic in order to hopefully achieve whether or not the ideas that have stuck out to me, are true or not. In the book Ethics, by Aristotle, plenty of concepts have stuck out to me, and made me think quite a bit. One of the ideas that stick out to

POL200Y1 – C. Orwin Maria Ouchnikova | 1001396170 Are Philosophers Good Citizens in Plato’s Republic? It seems that Plato says that the good man is a just man. Philosopher by nature is endowed with the ability to understand what justice is and how to achieve it. However, only because philosopher has the knowledge of the true sense, does that make them just and moreover a good citizen? To figure this out we need to look carefully at the definition of each of the terms. First of all, while the definition

In the end of Plato’s Republic Book I, Socrates and Thrasymachus who had just finished a set of vigorous arguments on what the definition for justice is and whether the just or the unjust life is the best life to live, come to a conclusion. Regarding the true definition of justice, at the end of Book I, Socrates mentions that their discussion have not led them to the true definition of justice (Republic 354b). On the other hand, their discussion on which life is more profitable does come to a conclusion

The introduction deals mainly with a twofold question: first what is justice? Second, why should we be just? He answers the first one as follow: justice is indeed both wisdom and virtue. He said that it is injustice that produces factions, hatreds, and quarrels among themselves, and justice that produce unanimity and friendship. He also said that justice is virtue of the soul. He justifies by saying that the just soul and the just man will have a good life, and the unjust man a bad one. He continues

Throughout Book 1 of Plato’s Republic, there are a variety of positions taken defending or objecting which is stronger, freer, and better: justice or injustice. Socrates believes that justice is a necessary and important good. Thrasymachus, on the other hand, does not believe this. Toward the end of 344c, he claims: So you see, Socrates, injustice, if it is on a large enough scale, is stronger, freer, and more masterful than justice. And, as I said from the beginning, justice is what is advantageous

For centuries, people have been asking the question, what is justice? Although justice is not sincerely defined in Plato’s The Republic, both Socrates and Thrasymachus enter into a deep discussion over what justice truly is. After Socrates disproves Cephalus and Polemarchus explanations of justice, Thrasymachus declares that justice is “simply what is in the interest of the stronger party” (338c). Furthermore, he debunks justice altogether, arguing that justice is the strong exploiting the weak and

and human nature before anyone else; Plato is a person who sides with the argument that philosophers play an important role in society. In Plato’s dialogue, Republic, he attempts to discover justice and to convey the importance philosophers possess in ensuring a just society. The main argument that will be addressed in this essay is that philosophers are useful and are essential to guarantee a truly just city. In this paper I will use Plato’s dialogue, Republic, and the claims mentioned throughout

Plato and Madison both wrote documents about a government that they believed would be the most successful. Plato believed that a government ruled by a chosen few, guardians, where everyone is living a minimalistic lifestyle would be successful. Madison on the other hand, believed that a big republic was the better path to take. Based on their government structure, Plato and Madison had a cynical view of human nature; however, Plato believed that all people were less trustworthy than Madison. Madison

Mercedes Chien Dr. Joel Klein Contemporary Civilization 2 November 2015 Family in Political Society Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Politics both accredit nature to the teleological functions of men, women, and children. Nevertheless, each philosopher defines family differently to support their main goals of finding the right type of society. While Plato does not conform to the traditional definition of a family—with a husband, wife, and children—and instead defines the role of men and women

Assignment 1 Within Plato’s Republic, are various theories and ideas about justice and if it something that is just in itself. This essay is meant to shine light on three of the key concepts – (1) He has succeeded in Thrasymachus’s challenge, (2) being just provides more happiness than being unjust, and (3) the letter of the city is irrelevant and does not help his case. Thrasymachus’s theory is that there is no benefit to being just and that benefit would only com to the powerful. However,