Problem of Evil Essay

The logical problem of evil is often referred to as the inconsistent triad, this being that the following propositions; God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent and evil exists, are inconsistent. Also known as a reduction ad absurdum argument, whereby all three propositions cannot be true together. Theists, like Swinburne, come to the conclusion that the three propositions are compatible with one another, whereas atheists, like Mackie, believe that they are incompatible and therefore God does not exist

Why does the good God allow suffering to exist? This is a very old problem. In more than four thousand years ago, a man had in their own, family and property tragic misfortune, facing the silent heaven shouting: “I will say to God, Do not put me down as a sinner; make clear to me what you have against me. What profit is it to you to be cruel, to give up the work of your hands, looking kindly on the design of evil-doers?” (Job 10:2-3) It is understandable that a terrorist was killed by a bomb he had

challenged in great detail when the Problem of Evil is discussed. A theist is someone who believes in God and in theism there is a coherent concept of God. A theist believes that God is an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent being. All these things describe God as all powerful, all knowing and all good/perfect being. Atheism is the belief that God does not exist and they believe that those beliefs of a theist cannot all be true at the same time. The Problem of Evil challenges all these beliefs of

Section 1: The nature of the basic principles In order to tackle the problem of evil and how it goes to demolishing the belief in God and therefore God himself, I need to pick apart the main issues that clash within this dispute. These main issues or ideas are God and Evil. I first have to look at the actual ideas that are held for both of these to understand both concepts, which will then allow me to show how the problems are formed from these two basic origins. The theistic belief in God

There are many questions today as to the theodicy problem and why bad things happen. In this paper, I write about my approach to the problem of evil and why bad things happen to good people. This paper responds to the problem of evil in five ways. First we perceive God as an evil God, and we define the nature of evil. Free will, natural evil and life values are also seen as a resolution to the problem of evil. As an imperfect human, we will not be able to understand God’s purpose to certain things

in two versions of the problem of evil. The first is the Logical Problem of Evil which claims that any existence of evil, ranging from paper cuts to genocide, is incompatible with the existence of an all-loving, all-knowing and all-powerful God. It follows that from the mere existence of evil we can conclude that God lacks at least one of his “Omni” attributes which poses a problem to some theists who believe in a perfect God. The other type is the Evidential Problem of Evil which claims that even

is the so-called ‘problem of evil’ a problem for anyone who believes in God? The problem of evil as suffering is a problem of what to do with the obstacle facing the believer and also this as a challenge to unbeliever for them to converge because they do not think it harmonising. Its contradict compatibility, an atheist often suggested that the present of evil entails the absence of God. Atheist argued that, if God exists, then he is an omnipotent, and able to prevent the evil occurrence. For omniscient

The problem of evil as suffering is a problem of what to do with the obstacle for the believer but also an obstacle to unbeliever to converge because they do not think it harmonising. In contradiction to compatibility, an atheist often suggested that the present of evil entails the absence of God. Atheist argued, if God exists, then as an omnipotent, he is able to prevent the evil occurrence. For omniscient, it implies under any circumstances evil will occur if he does not act. Then, being perfectly

The “problem of evil” has been discussed for multiple decades. Philosophers, religious believers, theologists, and many other professions and people struggle to perfectly answer this question. After reading Voltaire’s Candide as well as researching multiple viewpoints on this “problem of evil,” I personally do not believe in any co-existence between God and evil and conclude that justice, rather than evil, stems from our (human’s) genes. Voltaire’s view on evil comes from not only humans, but also

creates the problem of evil. If God knows evil exists, despises it, and has the power to destroy it, then the manifestation of evil in our current reality calls into question God’s very existence, since he logically should have gotten rid of any malevolence (Mackie). In practice, this principle calls into question a believer’s relationship with a higher power who seemingly allows sin. In theory, the presence of evil becomes a reason to disprove a supreme deity. On the other hand, if the problem of evil