Psychodynamic Approach Essay

Introduction In the aftermath of September 11, 2001, there were an array of confusion, anger, anxiety, fear, and hatred. Police officers and firefighters who responded to the events of 9/11 experienced delayed emotional reactions so they can accomplish their tasks. These first responders develop an ability to contain their emotions so they can deal with it later (Sauter & Carafano, 2012). Video images of two hijacked U.S. commercial airliners plowing into the twin towers were continuously replayed

people who are often stuck in the oral stage can have not seen the necessity to move forward to the other stages due to being overly loved in the first few years of childhood. The main explanation of developing depression according to Freud (a psychodynamic psychologist) is that a loss of a loved one or something very important to them, the loss can be real or something imagined (Lowry 1984) is the main cause for developing depression. However according to Ferster (1974) (a behaviourist) this psychologist

mental health problems. In the beginning of the semester, we learned about the psychodynamic perspective, the humanistic perspective, and the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) perspective. In addition to this, we recently learned about the multicultural/feminist perspective. Before this class, I was previously introduced to the psychodynamic perspective through other psychology classes. However, although the psychodynamic perspective was thoroughly discussed in my previous classes, the humanistic perspective

Introduction The reading of personality has a thick layer of theories in psychology and is one of the most important fragments of psychological history to this day. This paper will compare and contrast the differences between the great theories of the psychodynamic theory from Sigmund Freud and the humanistic theory from Carl Rogers. These two theorists have different views of how personality is developed, with both theorists influencing the world of psychological personality to this day. Disputes between

vital part in the scientific community of how we understand the mind, people’s behaviours and reasons for doing what they do. Three of the six key psychological perspectives that will be covered in this essay are; the biological perspective, the psychodynamic perspective and the behaviourist perspective. Along with a discussion on how these perspectives have developed throughout history, critical analysis will also be carried out as to the strengths and weaknesses of each of these three psychological

The field of psychology has opened different theories that are aimed to the study of the behaviour of human beings, as a result psychologists concluded with five psychological perspectives. Behaviourist, Biological, Psychodynamic, Cognitive and Humanistic perspectives are the deduction made after a depth study of the mental activity associated with the human behaviour. In this essay I will be comparing two psychological perspectives and their points of view in analysing aggressive behaviour. The

the big picture in psychology it makes senses for people to do so. There are five approaches to psychology and they are Cognitive, Behavioral, Biological, Humanistic, and Psychodynamic. All of these approaches are different from one another but can sometimes be used together to get a better understanding. “Behaviorist Approach emphasis the role of environmental stimuli in determining the way we act. In large measure, this means focusing on learning- changes in behavior which occur as the result of

“The applied field of abnormal psychology is filled with different "schools of thought" when it comes to models of abnormality. The four main models that better explain the psychological abnormality are the biological, behavioral, cognitive, and psychodynamic models. They all attempt to explain the causes and treatments for all psychological illnesses, and all from a different approaches Today several models are used to explain and treat abnormal functioning, this variety has resulted both from shifts

Lastly, the final behaviourist therapy would be systematic desensitisation and this was introduced by Joseph Wolpe. According to Wolpe (1965) cited by (Gross, 1999, p.1) ‘if a response inhibitory of anxiety can be made to occur in the presence of anxiety-evoking stimuli it will weaken the bond between these stimuli and the anxiety.’ This quote basically states that it would be humanly impossible to experience two opposite emotions at the same time (e.g. fear and relaxation.) Systematic desensitisation

Cognitive approach to Phobias The cognitive approach focuses on the thought process that a person goes through when developing a phobia. Here the fearful response is experienced as a result of the interpretation or distorted appraisal of events. Leading theorists in this field Albert Ellis (1962) and Aaron Beck (1963) suggest that the above mentioned factors contribute substantially to the development of a phobia. The interpretation of the event is what generates the phobia and not the event itself