Tacitus Essay

Ancient sources are inherently scathing of Agrippina due to the values placed upon the ideal Roman matrona at the time. Tacitus describes the idea matrona as one who was loyal to her family and above all else subservient to her husband. However, Agrippina subverts this role through her unbridled ambition for power and her ultimate goal of placing her son Nero in the role of Princeps. Tacitus emphasizes Agrippina’s masculine qualities, describing her as possessing a “masculine despotism” when “toying with

Though Pallas’ loyalty to Agrippina is questionable. Tacitus argues that they were lovers saying that she used her sexuality to gain political power. Her manipulative ways ensured the support she needed within the government to gain a powerful position and influence for both her and her son in the state.

First, The facts ABOUT JESUS were recorded by eyewitnesses, who gave firsthand testimony the what they had seen and heard. The apostles are the closest that we will get to verifiable truths. Where it can be argued that I as 21st centrury pastor , I am believing a lie that can be argued against the apostles, for they were in a position to verify the existence of Jesus, and willing to die for him. Now people die for lies all the times, however no one dies for a lie that they can easily verify as a

language choices make Dio’s inclination against Agrippina obvious. Suetonius and Tacitus share this disposition. All three historians corroborate in reference to Agrippina undertaking all possible actions to enhance Nero’s status as Claudius’s heir over Claudius’s paternal son Britannicus’. They further corroborate in presenting Agrippina as merciless; eliminating Lollia Paulina (Dio 1914, p. 18) and Domitius Lepida (Tacitus 109) before killing husband Claudius (Suetonius 1979, p. 189-3). This brutality

To what extent was Queen Boudicca the greatest resistance fighter in European history? The greatest resistance fighter is someone who displays courage in the face of adversity, firmly stands for justice against multiple obstacles, and exhibits outstanding leadership abilities. Queen Boudicca was the queen of a Celtic tribe on the island of Britain who led her people to a revolution against the Roman empire’s occupation of the country around 60 AD. Although her revolution ultimately failed, Queen

the men talked about is a roman historian named Tacitus. Tacitus’ last major book was called Annals where he mentions Christus. Lawrence has a piece of the book Annals translated from Latin to English saying, “whom the crowd called “Chrestians.” The founder of this name, Christ [Christus in Latin], had been executed in the reign of Tiberius by the procurator Pontius Pilate.” This section of Annals is a huge proof of Jesus’ existence. Even though Tacitus uses the name Christ as a general name and not

into carrying out the same act as his mother, killing her for full power, nevertheless also revealing his own emerging corrupt behaviours. This matricide was taken in great shock, in the annals of Tacitus, whose work is representative of high-class roman society around the time of 56 CE to 120 CE, Tacitus writes as seen in appendix 2, on the reasoning behind the act. This change in attitude from Nero can be linked to his second wife and mistress Poppaea. Poppaea was another woman who was ambitious

and frustration Nero he felt towards his mother, and primary sources such as ‘The Annals, By Tacitus, Written 109 A.C.E., Book XIII’ confirm that once this act had been accomplished, Nero showed no remorse or

Persecution in the church was expected and even prized as martyrs believed suffering brought them closer to Christ. But the church abused this understanding and created a cult of saints reflective of the old paganism of Rome. The purpose of this paper is to explore the early church and the persecution and criticisms that it went through. A background of the causes of such oppression will also be discussed as well as the role that Christians at that time played during this time of hurt. This paper

Nero "Let Nero be ever before your eyes, swollen with the pride of a long line of Caesars… an Emperor condemned by his own people… Nero will always be regretted" (Tacitus: The Principle of Adoption) Throughout the ages, Nero has been viewed as a rogue and a disgrace to the Roman Empire, thanks to unreliable primary sources. Because of this, Nero is now renowned world wide as the man who hated Christians, the man who killed Jesus and the man who wanted nothing but to satisfy