The Once and Future King Essay

ambition to be king by committing evil deeds, the result of the influence that Lady Macbeth has over him, and his kinship with the 3 Witches. Macbeth presents the theme of unchecked ambition as he does everything in his capability to become king without acknowledging the consequence of his deeds. In the opening of the play, Macbeth is a sympathetic soldier, however, once he met the 3 Witches, they tell him half-truths of being the future king, and as a result, he will do anything to be king. As

Macbeth attempts to control the future by killing those who stand in Macbeth's way, preventing Macbeth's power from staying strong, and to bury the past by making sure the blame of any wrongdoing is not on him, while also burying anybody who suspects or fails to support him, (illustrating the idea that any man at any cost will fight for what he believes is his right whether this goes against his morals or not). Macbeth attempts to control the future first, killing King Duncan, to provide himself with

decision, does he execute the king in his own home? Or does he respect his authority as it is, and remain in his position as the Thane of Glamis? Well, in the story of Macbeth, Macbeth is the Thane of Glamis, and he is also a war hero. He conquers many pieces of land, and even gets dubbed the Thane of Cawdor. Macbeth is known for his nobility, bravery, and honor, and he is given to opportunity of either throw all of that away, or to be a good Thane, and obey his king. Macbeth, being the greedy and

texts: Geoffrey of Monmouth's The History of the Kings Of Britain,

play Macbeth, William Shakespeare draws attention to the course of action an individual will follow when motivated to attain such riches they never thought were possible. The play Macbeth follows a warrior who is soon to be named the king. Macbeth faces many opponents once he is faced with the news of his new position in the chain of being. Macbeth kills many of his dear friends and many innocent children, men and women. Yet Macbeth's doom is also caused by a man who is motivated to obtain the throne

From a young age, King Arthur possessed the trait of innocence. King Arthur believed all people had good in them as he was quite naive. This simple thinking stayed with him even when he took the role as a King and had grown up. While innocent is a noble trait to have, this trait backstabbed the King. Innocence greatly affected King Arthur as an adult, for this trusting quality led to King Arthur’s tragedy. King Arthur was innocent since he was a little boy merely known as Art. Kay was arrogant toward

protagonist, Macbeth, illustrates the idea that power dictates a person’s life, corrupting their actions, pushing them to the brink of insanity. Macbeth, once loyal and honorable, progresses to a greedy and apathetic person towards the end of the play as a result of his ambitious pursuit of power. Macbeth begins

Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a riveting tale wherein three creatures tell an unfortunate man his future. These creatures, or witches, are able to advance the plot with their future-telling abilities. The witches advance the plot of Macbeth by telling Macbeth he will be king, telling Banquo his children will become king, and telling Macbeth that he cannot die. The witches tell Macbeth he will be king and Macbeth was leaving the chance at kingship up to fate, until his wife took over. Throughout the play

Heraclitus once said that to achieve “[great] results required [great] ambitions.”. The ambition of others has helped shape our planet and continues to establish legacies, modern marvels, and motivate massive change with its power. Although the strength we receive from ambition can be considered a blessing, it also becomes a disease of the soul if not used wisely. The power that an individual receives when given the opportunity to follow ambition can lead to the demise of the individual in the future if

For example, in the blog titled, “Making the Future Better, Together”, the author, Eboo Patel, claims, “King knew this. But it neither paralyzed him, nor made him cynical. He didn’t tie himself into knots trying to untie the mother of all contradictions. Instead, he committed himself, body and soul, to shaping the future” Patel 6). To state differently, though Martin Luther King Jr. knew that his ancestors were probably owned by George Washington, who gave did