Three Strikes Essay

In the article Three Strikes Burglar a Step Closer to Release a man named Dale Curtis Gaines has served 15 years in prison “after processing stolen computer equipment” (Payne, 2013). Due to Proposition 36, an amendment that makes criminals eligible to be released if their third crime was neither violent nor serious, Gaines is seeking release and prosecutors agreed on his qualification. Gaines must be able to prove that he is not a danger to society in order to be released. If released Gaines would

life-course offender or the chronic six percent. The predominant incapacitation method is the three strikes legislation. The selling point of the three-strikes legislation is the idea of removing the most dangerous criminals from society through selective incapacitation. In turn, removing these life-course offenders from society by long prison sentences will drastically reduce the crime rate. “Supporters of three strikes legislation argue that such statutes will end the criminal careers of such high-rate

Three Strikes Law Recidivism is a tendency to relapse into a former pattern of behavior or a tendency to return to criminal behavior. Many studies have been conducted about criminals who begin with petty crimes (misdemeanors) that repeat the same crimes or graduate to serious crimes (felonies). The fear of repeat offenders and the increase of recidivism ignited the federal and state governments to seek harsher ways to protect citizens’ safety. Mike Reynolds a photographer whose daughter, Kimber

The Three Strikes Law: Narrowing In on Non-Person Felonies Giving second chances or third chances are often difficult tasks when dealing with personal issues and relationships, but when crime is involved, the flood gates open wide with varying opinions. Questions of all degrees become intertwined with the basis of the crime, the type of victimization that took place, and how ‘morally wrong’ we as citizens view this criminal act. Oftentimes citizens, prosecutors, and even judges focus on what type

based on whether that action is right or wrong, rather than based on the consequences of the action. The three strikes law would not be ethical in regards to crimes that are considered to be more of a minor criminal act. If the prior convictions are not serious crimes and the defendant do not have a violent history, then the three strikes law need not apply. From a criminal justice perspective three time offender forfeit their right to be rehabilitated and are given very long sentences, up to life imprisonment

sound impossible, it is not as daunting as it seems. As an example, consider whether or not God forgives. If you believe that It forgives, then forgiveness is not only It's nature, forgiving is what It does, a principle of It's Law. Therefore, the three strikes rule cannot be a Law, since by nature and principle, Life is forgiving, and you can keep on swinging! Life is going to keep on providing another chance, and another, for as long as you keep trying. And furthermore, when you finally get it right

Brown, Brian, and Greg Jolivette. "A Primer: Three Strikes - The Impact After More Than a Decade." Legislative Analyst’s Office. Web. October 2005. In addition to providing comprehensive background information, this website includes specific examples of how this law has impacted society. For example, it details an important case: Ewing V. California. Ewing, who was on parole, was convicted and sentenced to twenty years to life for stealing three golf clubs worth $399 a piece from a Los Angeles country

One of the most controversial laws in the efforts to reduce crime has been the "three-strikes" laws that have been enacted. This law, which is already in twenty-seven states, requires that offenders convicted of three violent crimes be sentenced to life in prison without chance of parole. The law is based on the idea that the majority of felonies are committed by about 6% of hard core criminals and that crime can be eliminated by getting these criminals off the streets. Unfortunately, the law fails

Professor, The three strikes law was implemented in the early 1990's for offender that are consider to be an extreme nuisance to the community as well as being called habitual offenders. These criminals are ones that have committed two felonies and are on their third. Now with that being said the third felony does not have to be a severe or heinous act. The third felony could be something as simple as grand larceny or forgery (The free dictionary, Three Strike Laws). The three strike laws were first

many states began to enact the so-called Three Strikes, You're Out Law. The proponents of this legislation, including several victims' rights organizations, believe that habitual criminals do not have the desire or capacity to reform. The law mandates that State Courts impose life sentences to individuals convicted of three or more criminal offenses typically at the felony level. Now, habitual offenders in 24 States will face some form of the Three Strikes Law (Zimring, et.al., 2001). Since these