Witness Essay

There is a great importance on the questions that are asking to a witness about what they saw occur. Although they may be certain of what they saw there is potential for witness failure because of many factors. These factors can be things such as vision, lighting, memory and more. The vague description that a witness delivers can lead to errors which can lead to lots of problems in the investigation process. When the individuals were asked how old the suspect was in the video that they were shown

Dear James Blackburn, thank you for contacting me with your case. As an expert witness, I am more than happy to assist you in the examination of the prosecution witness’ evidence and account of the incident. Firstly, we must consider any confounding factors that may have influenced the witness’ memory and therefore influencing their testimony. Some factors we must consider are; cross-race effect (CRE), weapon focus effect, own age bias (OAB) and the bystander effect. I will attempt to aid you in

Witness Argument Essay In the story witness the title gives away that there were things that people saw heard and experienced, some know more than others and that’s what makes the story interesting. One person that witnessed the most was Leonora Sutter. She was a 12 year-old, African American who was engaged with what was happening around her. Lenora was aware and knew what was going on, which was interesting to know because she is only 12. She knew that in her community there was a big problem

Eye Witness Testimony The language used by the police when interviewing witnesses and barristers during a trial may influence answers given by witnesses, this language may affect initial perception and subsequent recall. Both of these effects are shown in the study by Loftus & Palmer {1974). My experiment into this field showed the leading question with the `verb` contained the information about what the answer should be, thus language can have a distorting effect

Introduction to Forensic Psychology Essay 1 Eye Witness Identification Reliability David Chung Bachelor of Social Science (Psychology) 30/08/2016 1898 words Introduction Eyewitnesses are vital in the court of law, first amid law enforcement examinations, subsequently a wellsprings of confirmation when legal proceedings are conveyed to trial. When assessing the reported accounts of eyewitnesses, the relative importance of concern should decide whether it is accurate or inaccurate

2016 Research Project for False Witness Credibility: Mistaken Eyewitness Identification On May 3, 1982, in Norfolk, Virginia at circuit court, 29-year old Julius Earl Ruffin was convicted of a rape he did not commit and was sentenced to five life sentences in prison. The case rested on Ann Meng, the victim who accused Ruffin as her assailant. Mistaken eyewitness identifications contributed to more than 75 percent of the more than 200 wrongful convictions in false witness credibility, as stated by the

4. I would hire a medical doctor as a testifying expert witness. Expert witnesses can play various roles, such as a consultant who is a non-testifying expert (FRE 701); an expert witness, who has allegiance is to the data/research(FRE 702); and a fact witness, whose testimony on personal knowledge, not opinion(FRE 602). The nature of the Expert’s role during litigation is objective, that is, it is neutral. The expert should help the fact finder reach a better-informed decision. Expert witnesses

Outline and evaluate research into the effects of anxiety on the accuracy of eye witness testimony. Eye witness testimonies are the evidence given in court or in police investigation by someone who has witnessed a crime or an accident. Eye witness testimonies are affected by a number of factors, but the one that I am going to focus on is anxiety. Laboratory studies and some ‘real life’ studies have generally shown impaired recall in people who have witnessed particularly distressing or anxiety

e Report, for Resource Utilisation, Witness Accuracy and Psychological Methods for Detection and Successful Prosecution. In order to comprehend the contribution of psychology to areas of criminal investigation it is important to evaluate research into two of the following areas of criminal investigation: eye witness testimony and offender profiling as well as assess the implications of the findings in the area of criminal investigation. In addition, this essay, with reference to relevant psychological

There are many reasons victims do no want to testify in court. Legal cynicism and witness intimidation are a couple of the top reasons. One reason I feel is overlooked is witness intimidation. Witness Intimidation is when threats are made by defendants to discourage victims or witnesses of a crime from reporting or testifying. (Connick and Davis 439) If a victim feels threatened, they often become hesitant to testify sometimes even to report the crime. With the right incentives, victims and witnesses

Whether an individual is a witness for or against your case, there are signs that a person may not be reliable. The following are a few things to look for. A witness's statement does not agree with the evidence This is not always obvious because a witness's statement can seem accurate except for a single variance with the physical evidence. This can be important because of the case were to go to trial, a simple discrepancy in the testimony could be exploited by the opposing attorney. Although it

Antigone Mock Trial Antigone: Charged with treason against The State and contempt What if Antigone had been given a fair trial with a jury of her peers? Would they have condemned her still? You get to be the prosecution & defense in determining a fair fate for Antigone. You must ask yourselves, did Antigone act with treasonous intent against The State or were her actions otherwise motivated? Even further, was this an act of the gods and beyond her control? During this trial, you must

Witness identification evidence is the second most incriminating type of evidence bar a confession (Brandon & Davies, 1973 – as cited by Valentine & Heaton, 1999). However, The Innocence Project reports it is also the leading cause of wrongful convictions in the US, more specifically, 72% of DNA exoneration cases since 1989. The aim of line-ups is to give the witness a fair test of recognition. Additionally, the suspect (who may be innocent) must also be given a fair chance. In the 1976 the Devlin

Jay also obviously knows about this crime so this is why I suggest he is there only to convict adnan. The evidence that convicted adnan is so insignificant and so shallow that I can't believe he committed this crime. The only evidence is Jay as a witness, and because of this I have to think that he knows who really did it.

allowed to testify in court because witness often can’t correctly remember the event and, there is no way to test the validity of statements. This can throw off the whole trial. One can come to this conclusion because; witnesses can’t remember, there is no way to test validity, the human brain shifts things around, witnesses often put personal input, witnesses statements have a lot of weight, outside influences affect testimonies, and innocent people are often

be uncomfortable. Nevertheless, bearing witness to the cruelties of the world is of utmost importance not only for the bystander’s growth and change in perceptions or bias but for the individual herself/ himself. To bear witness is to allow oneself to be impacted. By enveloping oneself in the unfamiliar experience possessed by an other there is a change in both the self and the other. The observer can be impacted in a very profound way through bearing witness. As illuminated through the previous review

Many people are enraged with the U.S. court system and feel that it does its job based on prejudice, unfair, and despicable standards in which it’s not held accountable for. This inserts a fear of the justice system within the people themselves with the resulting lack of trust created. There are countless cases of injustice that have made their way through the U.S. Court System such as the case of James Richardson was spent 21 years in jail for being accused for the poisoning and deaths of his 7

Johnson further maintains that the circuit court erred by admitting documents that were not properly authenticated. The State counters that “the appearance and contents of each of the documents contained sufficient information from which the factfinder could have reasonably concluded that the document was what the State purported it to be.” We hold that the documents admitted against Johnson were properly authenticated. Maryland Rule 5-901 provides that generally: The requirement of authentication

something I heard about as a child in Sunday school, something I thought was done in the past and not today. Stonings are alive to this day mostly in the middle east. more often than not women are stoned more than men. Convictions in Iran are based on witness testimony, judge conviction or confession; friends, family, neighbors and any other volunteers may participate in the stoning of a victim. Stoning is a horrific way to die, sometimes taking up to two hours to kill the victim. In the story “The Lottery”

time understanding when an emergency response is warranted. Added to the ambiguous nature of some emergencies, this combination can be deadly. The bystander effect has known effects on emergency situations, creating inaction when groups of people witness an event (Darley & Latane, 1968). Pluralistic ignorance and social proof principle are other social process that can cause major problems in the evolution of a crisis response. People in groups witnessing a potential emergent situation will look to