Witness Essay

alter their memory reports to coincide with other witnesses’ reports (Goodwin K.A. et al., 2013, pg. 91). If a co-witness is a friend or family then an individual is even more likely to conform to their views than they would be if the co-witness was a stranger. Kieckhaefer and Wright also found evidence that another factor that increases a witnesses memory conformity is if the co-witness is likable(Kieckhaefer, J.M. & Wright, D.B., 2015, pg. 463). There have been multiple studies conducted where researchers

It is likely that Ms. Gonzales will be found liable for Mr. Sutton’s injuries under the Dram Shop Act as the evidence shows both that Mr. Sutton had been “obviously intoxicated”, in a readily apparent manner, when he was served alcohol at Ms. Gonzales’s art show, and also because Mr. Sutton’s intoxicated state had been the proximate cause of his injuries. Tex. Alco. Bev. Code Ann. § 2.02 (LexisNexis, Lexis Advance through the 2015 regular session, 84th Legislature). There are two elements, within

When a crime is committed, one of the most important evidences for convincing jurors to make the decision is witness evidence. Witnesses in crimes have also been a crucial part on determining the final verdict. However, child witness testimony should not be allowed due to the harm that it inflicts on children. The article between a rock and a hard place: Why hearsay testimony may be a necessary evil in child sexual abuse cases by Watters, T., Brineman, J., & Wright, S. compares the positive and negative

The Boston Massacre took place on March 5th, 1770. This historic event was caused because of an ongoing conflict between the British soldiers and the people of Boston. According to George Hewes account, “Crowds of artisans and laborers joined the elite in protesting British policies, although their differing points of view revealed the divisions within colonial society.” People were upset over the British passing the Towsend Act, which was a surplus of unpopular taxes. The people of Boston also resented

After that, the trial started which was my brother and mother against the two of them. However, the state decided to take the case over and that turned my brother and mother into witnesses. For some reason they did not include myself on the witness list because I did not see the faces of the shooters, but I did see everything that was going on in the house while the shooting was going on. Anyway, the trial began and it felt like my mother and brother were on trial and not the two guys that were actually

professional way giving more details about the event focusing on the jumpers in general and what made them make the decision of jumping from the buildings. These literary works talk about the same event, they share elements as setting, the use of witness account, and tone but the authors tell the event in different ways. Even though their works have the same setting, they have differences like how the authors tell their witnesses testimonies or

A. The term bystander refers to the phenomenon in which the greater the numbers of people present, the less likely people are to help a person in distress. When an emergency situation occurs, observers are more likely to take action if there are few or no other witnesses, but in other cases the observers are most likely to be ignorant either because they don't want to intervene or feel as if it's not there responsibility to take action. B. Bystander is important because it's safe for people to know

40] "A. (pausing) um um (no)." (Citation- http://www.leagle.com/decision/2004577541US36_1575) Analysis: Cross-examination is critical during litigation. Many cases have to be proven based on solely witness testimony because of the lack of physical evidence. Therefore, the responsibility of a witness to tell the truth relies on methods

exonerated by DNA testing. The article summarizes that of 175 people exonerated nationwide by DNA testing, three-quarters were convicted on the strength of misidentification by a witness (Avril, 2006). The strength of this article supports this author’s hypothesis that race-bias plays a role in misidentification by the witness. DiGiovanni, L. (2010). Accuracy of eyewitness identification of black Americans as a function of social dominance orientation and cross race contact. (Order No. 3405267, Hofstra

of March 5, 1770, was absolutely no exception. Evidence is spotty, details can be lacking, and testimonies are often told from a personal and bias perspective. Determining the bias of each testimony is key to learning the motivations behind each witness, which in turn is key in deciphering the actual events of the Boston Massacre. One is right to wonder, through all of the conflicting testimonies, whether the Boston Massacre really was a massacre. The Boston Massacre is viewed with overwhelming bias