Wrongful Conviction Essay

long time to solve a case in order to gather enough evidence but most of the times they don’t find enough evidence to even find suspect. What are some errors arson investigators have made resulting in wrongful convictions? Include not only the errors, but which cases they took place in, and how wrongful thinking was applied. What do you think should be done to prevent these errors in the future? In this paper we are going to talk about the Willingham case, Lime Street Fire, and the Taylor case. In

1593-1594, 1610). According to Medwed what distorts the prosecution in wrongful convictions is the combination of mainly these biases, that together all are part of what is called "tunnel vision" (Medwed, 2010, p. 2203. Finder and Scott (2006) defines tunnel vision is in regards to the criminal justice system as a fallacy that leads the prosecution to "focus on a suspect, select and filter the evidence that will ‘build a case ' for conviction while ignoring or suppressing evidence that points

The Problem with Race in Wrongful Conviction and Exoneration Introduction The main purpose of this article is to look at the possible link between race and exoneration, and how race and wrongful convictions lead to the exonerations. There were three reasons that the authors chose this topic to research. The first reason was the research previously done in the field show racial biased in the criminal justice system. This paper looks at how that effects wrongful conviction and the subsequent exoneration

very evident in the the 1969 wrongful conviction of David Milgaard who was accused of the rape and murder of Gail Miller. Though modern forensic science was virtually non existent in 1969, that does not negate the fact that a lack of strict protocol was what lead to an innocent man being incarcerated. The improper interrogation of the witnesses in this case and the fact that investigators where not following up on all leads given played a huge role in his conviction. The importance of witness testimony

Wrongful Convictions and DNA I am sided with the right to allow DNA Analysis for a crime a suspect is convicted for committing but is pledging not guilty in the trial. About 0.5% convictions of crime are the innocent serving jail time in prison or death row and are not even the actual suspect of the crime scene putting other people at fault of those who have not done any harm. This even violates an individual’s right of freedom as they are being wrongfully accused and imprisoned. These people

Differential Treatment and Wrongful Convictions Benefits: Differential treatment in the legal system, where individuals are treated differently based on factors such as race, socio-economic status, or other personal characteristics, can lead to wrongful convictions. However, it's important to clarify that there are no inherent benefits to wrongful convictions. Rather, addressing differential treatment and preventing wrongful convictions is essential for a fair and just legal system. Addressing differential

In the beginning of the 1930’s wrongful convictions tended to attract quite a bit of attention in the United States, but it mostly focuses on the individual cases. Some have extensively with the more visibility cases such as the Scottsboro boys, the Lindbergh baby kidnapping and murder and more recent cases like the the Randall Dale Adams case in Texas who faced wrongful conviction, imprisonment, and near execution. Some cases have the attention of the public, including the Sam Sheppard case, which

Two contributing factors to the wrongful conviction of Anthony Smith are eyewitness identification and the adversarial process. The adversarial process relies on the skills and resources of the defense and prosecution. Eyewitness identification includes evidence from a witness who has seen the event and can pick out a perpetrator. In this case, some reasons Smith was wrongfully convicted was because of the adversarial process, he hired a private lawyer Akim Gurdy, but could only pay $3,000 of the

cases where criminal law has punished the offender who turned out to be innocent. A conviction is needed to show that the system is not in disrepute and to keep order and people safe in society. If a criminal cannot be caught then people will look down upon the system in disgrace. In many cases, officers will arrest an individual who fits a certain description that they know will lead to an arrest and conviction. In the case of Guy Paul Morin it shows how the system failed in aiding the innocent

cases where criminal law has punished the offender who turned out to be innocent. A conviction is needed to show that the system is not in disrepute and to keep order and people safe in society. If a criminal cannot be caught then people will look down upon the system in disgrace. In many cases, officers will arrest an individual who fits a certain description that they know will lead to an arrest and conviction. In the case of Guy Paul Morin it shows how the system failed in aiding the innocent