Achieving peace

(the works cited are missing form this paper) The modern state’s approach to peace is primarily a justification for militarism and warfare. Examples of this include the proliferation of nuclear capabilities, the “war on terror,” and what time, money, and forces are dedicated to military action compared to peacekeeping missions through the U.N. The issue of nuclear warfare is a good example of militarism justified by supposed need for defense and security. Donald Davidson’s book explains that

The nature of inner peace is complex and multifaceted. Peace is not merely the absence of hostility, violence or war but encompasses a larger concept whereby inner peace is attained. Peace begins with individual awareness and personal response to the teachings of the religious traditions. An individual’s understanding of peace is expressed through the principal teachings drawn from the sacred texts of Christianity and Islam that is, the New Testament and the Quran respectively. These teachings guide

Peace is a complex, multifaceted concept that is immensely central to every religious community. Peace is the essence of all religions, the reason being that the objectives of religion can never be fulfilled without peace. Each religion shares a similar purpose, to guide their adherents to achieving peace through spiritual development and growth, allowing enlightenment among individuals and creation. The idea of peace is commonly categorised into two main branches, inner peace and world peace. Both

conflict within our societies or beyond is far better than bearing arms to resolve disputes. More so, in the article Murphy pointed out that some of the fundamental justification for her entire premises about reconciliation and it morality towards peace making. In addition to the above point, I also agree with Murphy’s argument that extrapolating the political concept of forgiveness from the personal one has significant problems which are currently disturbing

This article expresses to both pacifists and non-pacifists that one does not have to settle for the world’s current state of affairs regarding peace and stresses the importance of active resistance against evil. It puts forth several ideas to aid in the progression of a more peaceful society through the reduction of military force. This article acknowledges that many Americans believe that there is no solution to the current military system. In response, it argues that the answer to this problem

world peace. One leading figure with great contribution to this thought is Immanuel Kant. “Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) is the central figure in modern philosophy. He synthesized early modern rationalism and empiricism and continues to exercise a significant influence in, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy etc.” (Michael, 2016). One of his most widely known and perhaps, the most relevant works on the concept of world government (he called it world federation), is entitled perpetual peace.

people will almost certainly be highly angered at the opposing sides for events that occur during conflict. Not only that, but often times, conflicting parties never even reach this point. Some conflicts only end in a ceasefire and never reach a full peace

morality of the concluding phase of the war. The objective is to maintain peace and justice after the war is over, which will mitigate any other blow ups that may be forthcoming. Just Post Bellum consists of four principle: just cause, reconciliation, punishment, and restoration. These fundamental areas all aid guidance to promote Augustine’s tranquillitas ordinis. “Just war should aim at establishing a just peace” (11) Lifelong peace is what Augustine and the Just Post Bellum are the ultimate desired

world powers of the time had been more well versed in peace building customs that the war might have been avoided. However, the war seems to stem from a root of greed, which eventually manifested itself in a violent outburst, rather than stemming from a root of ignorance of peaceful practices. The war itself boils down

The notion of peace is complex and multi-faceted. Peace is not merely the absence of hostility, violence or war, but encompasses a larger concept wherein there are various contributing factors such as healthy international relationships, security in matters of global or economic welfare and equality and fairness in political relationships. The nature of peace is also tied to concerns of the causes for it’s loss – be them social justice, economic inequality or political and religious radicalism. By