Argument on Gun Control Essay

The question of gun control laws in the United States is a particularly divisive issue. Through the media coverage of recent events concerning gun violence in this country alone, including the mass shootings in Orlando, San Bernardino, and Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, arguments for and against stricter gun regulations have ignited a controversial debate that seems to have no easy resolution. With the increased in the number of deadly mass shootings, there has also been a

involving firearms the focus is turned to gun control. This has turned the issue of gun control into a major debate in our nation. When it comes to taking a side on the issue many people decide completely on an emotional level instead of looking at the issue rationally. People think that solving violent crimes involving guns is as easy as taking away the guns. How do you go about taking guns away if that is the solution, or what will the effects be of taking guns away from people who don’t use them for

Do Not Punish the Good Guys As James Bacon quoted Fred A. Roff, Jr., “Guns don’t kill people. People kill people” (Bacon). This well-known saying has been modified over the years to fit people’s needs, but it has become one of anti-gun control supporter’s arguments since its inception. Gun control in the United States has been a source of major disagreements across the country for centuries. It is such a controversial topic that it is usually a platform point for presidential candidates due to

The gun control epidemic has swept across America like wildfire. Opposing views on gun control have been argued tirelessly to no avail. As guns become more readily available, a great number of protests come forth. This seemingly never-ending cycle is at the forefront of most North American's conscience.Whether these protests are on the local news stations, newspapers, or on the abundance of social media outlets you cannot escape the gun control conversation and propaganda. Many people believe citizens

stricter federal handgun control laws because stricter gun control laws would reduce the number of handgun deaths and injuries, more gun control laws would lead to fewer suicides, banning high-capacity magazines would prevent mass shootings and murders, stricter gun control laws have worked in other countries by leading to lower homicide and suicide rates than the United States, and guns are rarely used in self-defense and they do not decrease crime rates. Stricter gun control laws would reduce the

The problem of gun control is hotly debated nowadays. 50% of the population are for it explaining that having a gun provides them some protection. Because of various reasons our justice system cannot always protect us which is why the majority of people is looking for some other ways of staying safe. However, a gun is still a weapon. Despite the fact that most people want to possess it in order to be on the safe side, we are aware of a lot of accidents when innocent people were hurt unintentionally

Many gun control activists argue that the reason of how youth obtain a gun to carry out their acts is partly due to the lack of properly securing the weapons by the gun owner, especially the parents. Child access prevention laws (CAP) requires gun owners to keep their weapons locked up and/or making the owner of the gun responsible if a youth gains access to the gun and harms someone with it. The National Rifle Association (NRA) also encourages gun owners to keep guns locked up when not in use. (Kleck

Wesley Walker Jerusha McClendon ENGL 1100 12 December 2017 Introduction I picked the topic, gun violence. Gun violence has shocked this nation has a rollercoaster. Having guns in our society has also caused many deaths around the world over something senseless. Nevertheless, there is always a debate about gun control, but there is no current move about this topic. Gun violence happens daily because people can get various access to it without background test, drug screening etc. Eventually, it has

still apply today. The two extreme sides of this argument as stated in Henry Winkler’s book are the Gun Nuts and the Gun Grabbers (Winkler 15,45). One side argues that there should not be any guns at all, and the other side argues that everyone should have a gun. This discussion has been around for decades, and I believe that it is not going away anytime soon. There are a few arguments as to why I believe that the government shall not and cannot remove guns from American citizens. First, I believe that

of us assume we must either oppose or support gun control. Not so. We have a range of alternatives. Even this way of speaking oversimplifies our choices since there are two distinct scales on which to place alternatives. One scale concerns the degree (if at all) to which guns should be abolished. This scale moves from those who want no abolition (NA) of any guns, through those who want moderate abolition (MA) - to forbid access to some subclasses of guns - to those who want absolute abolition (AA)