Barbaric

wool of sheep to creating the largest connected and mass empire in the history of the world exemplifies some behaviors of being barbaric leading people to think they are just completely barbaric. However, to me they are somewhat barbaric but not utterly barbaric. If the mongols were barbaric how did they managed to conquer almost all of the known world? Instead of barbaric a more important description for the Mongols would be they are intelligent and well trained. In the background essay in paragraph

Would you decide life or death based on your love or jealousy? The princess is faced with the decision of her lover's life and death decision based on her thoughts of love. The princess, the king, and the whole city have a semi barbaric thought train making them want to see deadly decisions. The princess sent the youth to the door of the lady due to the fact that she loved him too much to let him die, she knew he had broken the laws to be with her, and she wasn't too resentful of the lady to let

The reasoning behind the tiger coming out of the door is because of the princess’s barbaric nature. As it say's in the story, “This semi-barbaric king had a daughter as blooming as his most florid fancies, and with a soul as fervent and imperious as his own (Stockhon).” However, it has also been said that “The royal maiden was well satisfied with her lover- she loved him with an ardor that had enough of barbarism- (Stockhon).” The princess appears to have acted by her own self-interest. She knew

because of their tactics and strategies. The Mongols were called barbaric are they really they may have destroyed cities and villages but they were human to the fought with smarts and brawn they are strong they did everything civilized they ate they had the life of normal citizens yes they may have killed like barbarians but they fought like humans nothing was going to stand in their way they are humans they try their best they seem barbaric they have the heart of

The future of civilization when placed in the hands of those deemed “barbaric” is entirely up to the rest of us. Just as beauty lies in the eye of the beholder, society’s fate lies in the hands of those who choose to keep moving forward despite their opposition. However, I cannot help but ask myself: what makes someone barbaric? Are they widely different than the masses or possess unconventional goals for the future? The optimist inside of me must believe that even barbarians are pushing us toward

Were the Mongols Really Barbaric? There have been many historians and just regular people that take one look at the Mongols and just assume right away that they were ruthless barbarians that killed anyone in their way or without the same beliefs. But if you take a closer look is that still true? No. The mongols were in fact not barbaric but in turn were civilized. Although some people will still make the argument even after that closer look that Mongols were uncivilized monsters. I see

lands strategically. Most of the history that is kept about the Mongols does not come from a Mongol perspective. Many have debated whether the Mongols should be remembered as barbarians or as advanced peoples. The Mongols should be remembered as barbaric because they uprooted their people and others, and

There are many ancient sources stating that the Huns themselves were barbaric nomads. Ammianus Marcellinus, a Roman writer states in the History of Rome, that “The nation of the Huns surpasses all other barbarians in wildness of life… They fight in no regular order of battle… It must be owned that they are the most terrible of warriors because they fight at a distance with missile weapons having sharpened bones admirably fastened to the shaft. When in close combat with swords, they fight without

The Mongols: How Barbaric Were They? The Mongols originated in central Asia and conquered one after the other, earning the reputation of “barbarians.” It started off with Genghis Khan and the Mongols who first attacked their neighbors, then the Persian empire of Khwarazm, another wave which included Russia and Eastern Europe, and a third wave of The Middle East. At their peak, the Mongols had conquered 4,860,000 square miles of land, making them larger than what Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler

In the Pacific World there are many societies, some may be considered civilized while others may be considered barbaric. Over the course of history in the Pacific World many cultures have clashed with each other. Civilized cultures have been known to exploit barbaric cultures for resources, slaves, and territory. When the Spanish Empire conquered lands in Pacific Islands and in the Americas, they enslaved and exploited the locals. The Portuguese were another European power that conquered nations