Belief

Rationality in Religious Belief The obtaining of information is an inseparable part of human life, and therefore in what ever one may do; one will always collect information. To be of any value, the information collected has to be reliable, and one does not seem to doubt the reliability of evidence because they believe it to be logical, unless they are a sceptic. Some say that religion is something we cannot prove because we acknowledge religion through our feelings

of Justified True Belief (JTB) that Edmund L. Gettier refutes by proposing countermanding methods of justification in the acquisition of knowledge. JTB has historically defined the important equation that knowledge can be conceptually deciphered through the subjective belief of an individual. Historically, the “justification” of a belief was found to be sufficient to identify the belief as a form of objective knowledge. However, Gettier’s problem defines the limitation of belief, which can often be

“The Greeks regraded the burial of the dead as one of the most sacred duties. It neglect involving an offense against the dead; for, according to the popular belief, the soul obtained no rest in the realms of the dead,so long as the body remained unburied” (DLVF). King Creon puts his own laws above the gods laws. Sophocles shows his belief by showing what happens to those who disobeys the gods laws and they will be punished for it. King Creon lost all of his son, wife, and nieces because of his

share that reason with other people (1 Peter 3:15). The argument of faith and reason is seen in numerous philosophical writings such as Blaise Pascal’s Faith is a Logical Bet or W.K. Clifford’s The Ethics of Belief. In both we find strengths and weaknesses which defend their individual beliefs based on reasoning and logical thinking. Before we consider what Blaise Pascal’s argument is between faith and reason, we must

This semester I decided to take Psychology of Paranormal Beliefs and I did not know what to expect from it. I was not sure if we would talk about ghost stories, bigfoot, and aliens etc. Although I was unsure of why I wanted to take the course, I knew it would be interesting and possibly a good learning experience. This reflection paper will show my different thoughts, views, and opinions that I have learned throughout this course. Throughout the semester, I have learned a lot but thing I can

For an example, consider two alternative belief systems A and B consisting of beliefs A1, A2 and B1, B2 respectively. There are two beliefs in each system none of which can justify themselves alone. If A1 → A2 and A2 → A1, then there are 2 inferential connections in A and a high inferential density. Bonjour says this makes A likely. However, if only B1 → B2 and not vice versa, then there is only 1 non-mutual inferential connection in B and thus a low inferential density. Bonjour suggests that lack

of the weird little myths/belief your grandma talked about when you were little or even now are true? Or Where do they come from? What's the difference between a belief and a myth? Are widely held views often wrong or are such views more likely to be correct? everyone has their own opinion and in my opinion most widely held beliefs are wrong. there's many evidence on how most widely held beliefs turn out to be wrong and this is why. We know examples of widely held beliefs that we probably heard, but

Personal values are the core of our beliefs and values that we hold in and around our lives. As we learn and grow, we accept new values and beliefs. We discard the ones that no longer work as we grow and develop ourselves. Some of those values when growing up are ingrained by our family, friends, community and the experiences which have contribute to our views. When we hear about why two people fall in love, we hear that they tend to have the same values and beliefs. Those would be our core values

In Edmund L. Gettier’s essay “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?”, Gettier argues that there are instances in which p is true, S believes that p, and S is justified in believing that p, yet S still does not know p. In arguing this, Gettier is stating that having Justified True Belief is not sufficient for having knowledge. To support this argument, Gettier states Smith has strong evidence that Jones owns a Ford, but is completely unaware of where his friend Brown may be. However, he randomly creates

Cross Cultural Beliefs about The Afterlife. Seminar in Individual Differences and Personality Abstract A study of American undergraduates indicated that the beliefs about the nature of life after death were quite complicated. A 41-item questionnaire produced 12 independent groups of beliefs. Belief in an internal locus of control and that one’s life is owned by God were associated with a more positive view of the afterlife, as was being Roman Catholic rather than Protestant