Bell Hooks Essay

Over time we can see how our civilization can socially change based on the transformations from a person’s behaviors, culture or social structures. Both Audre Lorde and Bell Hooks are talking in her essays about the many forms of being oppressed by someone. Those domination might be patriarchal, but both are emphasizing our society to acknowledge oppression from all genders, not only from men. Moreover, they talk that females are not only can be seen as the victim, they are also as perpetrators.

The speaker, Bell Hooks starts off “By writing the autobiography, it was not just this Gloria I would be rid of, but the past that had a hold on me, that kept me from the present. I wanted not to forget the past but to break its hold” (80). It’s understandable that the audience can assume that it’s going to be about her struggling to break her past so she’s able to live in the now. However, the further the audience reads the passage, it explains about discrimination and the segregation community

Both Laura Mulvey and bell hooks describe the idea of the “gaze” in film. In both of the theories presented by Mulvey and hooks, the “gaze” is the way in which viewers are subjected to a particular perspective because of their social standing. In Mulvey’s case, she argues that the “gaze” in which the audience is forced into is that of the “male gaze” while hooks argues a more nuanced “gaze” including the “oppositional gaze”. While some of Mulvey’s argument is accurate, hooks argues that it leaves

academically based, bell hooks's essay "Keeping Close to Home: Class and Education" is an essay that I consider to be very touching. While arguing in her essay that the rich class and the working-class should come to respect and understand each other, bell hooks employs three elements of argument: ethos, pathos, and logos. With her usage of ethos, hooks relates her experience as an undergraduate at Stanford. Providing an experience from a time before she went to Stanford, hooks uses pathos to inspire

1) How does Reagon's "Are My Hands Clean?" song about social justice relate to "feminism," as hooks explains feminism? Bell hooks suggests “feminism as a movement to end sexist oppression” (hooks 240) which is an awareness that guides attention to the structural dominance and intersectionality of oppression in gender, race, and class (hooks 240). However, in the lyrics of Bernice Johnson Reagon’s, "Are My Hands Clean?" is song about social justice; “third world women toil doing piece work…/” (Reagon

the excerpts of writing Sheryl Sandberg and bell hooks offer us, their focal point is feminism. Although this is the case, their reasonings for being a feminist are quite different. Sandberg focuses on rising in the career field as a woman, and hooks argues against her writing because she has a narrow definition of being a feminist. There are strong arguments for either side as to which is more correct. The first argument I’d like to point out is hooks’. This is her stabbing at her take on feminism

“Keeping Close to Home” is an article written by an African-American woman, Bell Hooks. In the article, Bell Hooks argues that its critical to maintain one’s family ties as one seeks higher education. Nonetheless, keeping in touch with one’s family is essential, but Bell Hooks seems on more dubious ground when she claims that working-class parents worry about their children being ashamed of their background or never returning home, because they’ve attended a higher institution. It ignores the reality

females in the work force, as well as, the way society prompts boys compared to girls. Bell Hook, in contrast, provides a deeper understanding of feminist ideals, along with, an in depth analysis of Sandberg’s work. The articles written by Bell Hook and Sheryl Sandberg express each woman’s perspective on modern feminism; although they both call for action, Sandberg focuses on the inequality between the sexes, while Hook broadens the overall argument to include topics such as race, sexuality and class

Toni Morrison and bell hooks       Toni Morrison and bell hooks are both known to be critical theorists. They believe that the dominant views in society are not the only views to perceive. "The Nobel Lecture," a speech Toni Morrison given Stockholm, and "Sorrowful Black Death is Not a Hot Ticket," by bell hooks, are two different pieces by these powerful women, that have their own views about issues in the world. Toni Morrison tells a story about a wise, old, blind woman, that is teaching

In analyzing both essays, Eating the Other: Desire and Resistance by Bell Hooks and There Is No Unmarked Woman by Deborah Tannen the authors address societal problems that highlight and emphasize the differences that certain groups in society must face and overcome, although the targets in both of the examples of societal dilemma between the two are very different, they both accurately represent how unjust the modern social structure is. Tannen begins her essay with the description of three different