Body Camera Essay

affirmative and negative side. The first affirmative speaker begins the argument and is then followed by the first negative speaker. When given the debate topic, my group and I were told that we will be debating the issue on body cameras, in which we resolve that the body camera should or should not be implemented by police officers across the U.S. It is important to understand what makes a great debate topic in order to win the argument. When looking for any information about a case I tend to ask

View from the Cheap Seats A shot rings out in the night and soon after, there is a body in the streets. Within days there are multiple eye witnesses on the news, protests in the streets and silence from official sources. This has become an all too common occurrence today in regards to police where the public outcry after deadly force incident can go out of control before officials have had a chance to review the facts. Nearly 1,000 people were killed by police in 2016, with 2017 on pace to top that

Technology is constantly advancing throughout the years. One technological advancement is body-worn video(BWV) or head cameras. The BWV is worn on a shirt, jacket, or even a helmet. This advancement has become beneficial to our livelihood and law enforcement agencies(LEAs). Peace officers and citizens are safer due to the use of body cameras. This paper will be discussing the reasons its safer and the statistics behind it. The advancement of technology has made it to where the common

Thankfully, new technology is being introduced to allow the police to fight back. Body cameras are little cameras that are like having another pair of eyes. Once activated, they record everything one can see. Body cameras are a valuable invention as they assist in finding criminals, can be beneficial to teachers and give cops a chance of documenting their actions, and is economical. As with abundant inventions, body cameras weren 't invented until something major happened. In 2011, when Walter Scott

Body cameras can be the difference between innocent and guilty. Due to the outbreak of reports of police brutality, many departments have turned to body cameras to help eliminate this concern. Despite arguments against body cameras it is clear that they will keep everyone in check. Perhaps if every officer in the U.S. wore a body camera everyone would behave like they should and protect everyone. All police officers should wear body cameras while on duty because body cameras protect the officer,

On the blood-stained pavement lies the body of Michael Brown, an unarmed black eighteen-year-old. Bullet casings surround the area as an officer, Darren Wilson, lowers his gun. On August 9, 2014, Michael Brown was shot and killed by police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. One hundred eight days later, on November 24, 2014, the St. Louis County prosecutor revealed that the jury reached the verdict that Mr. Wilson would not be charged for his crime. The jury made

start wearing body-cameras during their shift. It seems like every time your turn on your local news channel they are broadcasting incidents of police brutality almost on a daily basis. Many citizens and lawmakers believe that a stance needs to be made, and many people feel that all on-duty officers should have to wear body-cameras during their shift in order to reduce the number of police relate incidents. Some local jurisdictions have passed laws to start using police body cameras with the hope

The Benefits of Police Body Cameras Michael Davies loves his job as a detective and loves the people around him, but the citizens of his community are scared of his fellow officers and Mike does not know why or how to fix it. Officer Davies goes to a police conference in Chicago to find out how to help his community, and after hearing about a useful device, he introduces the body camera idea to his Mayor. The mayor loved his idea because it protects the men and women on the force and the people

police officers wearing body cameras that would record every interaction with the citizen” (pp. 211, 2017). The ability of body cameras to provide an unbiased account of interactions is an invaluable asset when trying to reconstruct a truthful, chronological interpretation of events. The camera never lies and provides evidence for a case provided from the point-of-view officers involved. As with every topic, several pros and cons are involved with the use of body cameras by law enforcement. The

The need for police officers to be equipped with body cameras while on duty is crucial in rebuilding community relations and increasing police accountability. As such, there are various benefits and consequences in the implementation of this proposed policy for all police departments. While benefits include lowering rates of police misconduct, increased accountability and transparency, improved officer training, providing effective evidence for trials and reduction of civilian complaints, there are