Body Camera Essay

The debatable topic of police body cameras has an extensive history to it. There has been a demand for more police surveillance since the civil rights movement, but within the past six years the demand for the new technology of body cameras has grown far greater than before. A popular example of this is the death of Walter Scott by police officer Michael Slager. Slager said in his report that he had to shoot Scott because Scott had obtained his taser and was a danger to him, however a bystander released

“Body Worn Cameras are spreading worldwide, under the assumption that police performance, conduct, accountability, and legitimacy, in the eyes of the public, are enhanced as a result of using these devices. Also, suspects' demeanor during police-public engagements is hypothesized to change as a consequence of the video-recording of the encounter” (Ariel, 2016, para.1). Research has shown that body-worn cameras by law enforcement officers dramatically reduces both civilian complaints against officers

happen again if law enforcement wore body cameras during their shifts. Body-worn cameras are a video recorder mainly used by police and law enforcement to record interactions with the public, evidence at crime scenes while still improving officer and citizen accountability. Due to the recent rise in news following innocent people being unjustly shot by law enforcement, the idea of wearing body cameras are starting to look like a great idea. Body worn cameras seem like a great asset to utilize for

police officers for their actions and believe that the implementation of body cameras on an officer’s uniform is crucial for the safety of people. Although some may argue that body-worn cameras reduce the number of incidents and that footage recovered can serve as evidence, the truth of the matter is body cameras violate the privacy of people, there is a broad selection of cameras with different capabilities, and issues with camera data can be problematic.

One of the biggest issues around in today’s society is the use of body worn cameras on police officers while on duty. There is a lot of scrutiny on whether or not the cameras should be rolling at all times while the officer is on duty. People question the footage of the videos once they are released; questions such as, “Does this footage tell the whole story?” and, “Was the officers body worn camera on at the beginning of the incident?” and, “When can the public see the footage?” Once a police

Behave—You’re Being Filmed In today’s world, body cameras are being worn by more than half of the police officers in the United States. Many people will say that body cameras are invading their privacy and they will cause bigger issues, but others will say that the body cameras are an improvement and will help everyone out in the long run by resolving the issues. Body cameras will prevent incidents of police brutality and improve law enforcement. They should be worn for the police officer’s safety

minds of concerned people is that the use of the police body cameras prevent Michael’s death? Many people believe that the police body cameras are the solution to a situation like this since it enables recording of interactions between the police officers and civilians. The recorded interactions may aid in judging whether the police officers used unfair treatment or not. However, myriad questions still surround the use of the police body cameras, encompassing its effect on the privacy rights and police-civilian

would not be able to have “ getting to know each other” conversations with other people without being recorded or being used against them. “For example, as the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) pointed out in their September 2014 report on body cameras, crime victims (especially victims of rape, abuse, and other sensitive crimes), as well as witnesses who are concerned about retaliation if seen cooperating with police, may have very good reasons for not wanting police to record their interactions

lost therefore there is the current talk of incorporating police body cameras. Since the major event that occurred on August 9th in 2014, where an 18-year-old boy named Michael Brown who was shot by Officer Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri many people around the nation believed that if there has been any footage of that day, Officer Wilson would be able to show and demonstrate his actions without any doubt. “Post-Ferguson, body cameras became a hot topic nationally. In December, the White House proposed

“In the first year after the camera 's introduction, the use of force by officers’ decline 60%, and citizens’ complaints against police fell 88%”. (Christopher Mims) The introduction of police body cameras impacted the world in many better ways than bad. But, police body cameras were introduced due to the public 's awareness to police brutality and numerous of publicity deaths which has impacted the outcome of police interactions. Police body cameras were first thought of when an awareness of police