Cesare Pugni

Sort By:
Page 27 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout history, the ruling classes have normally offered protection to the areas of their jurisdiction. These rulers usually have the false hope of controlling their territory forever; thus they build harmonious relationships with the people they rule so that these people can protect them from external attacks. To achieve such a relationship between the ruler and his subjects, the rulers would occasionally instill fear into their warriors’ minds. The other way of building this relationship was

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    the reason that the prince has evoked so much discussion and controversy is because some of the things that he said was against the view of power. Machiavelli believed that the government is corrupted he also felt like everyone should die for example he says if you take down the king he will have many options with his family. he really questioned the if the rulers of this time should still stand many scholars ask the question of why he felt this way. the government at this time was extremely cruel

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Princin Ain’t Easy Prince Charming does not exist. Niccolo Machiavelli stresses in “The Qualities of a Prince”, that a prince needs to meet the needs of the majority in order to be a wise leader. He also stresses how hard being a prince can be, due to the juxtaposition of the needs of the common people. A prince has a very specific agenda he has to follow, with little room for error. A prince has to be willing to do whatever it takes in order to be a wise leader. A prince should be generous

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mark Hulliung, writing in 1983, offers an extremely polemical work to the field in his book Citizen Machiavelli. For Hulliung, Machiavelli is a genuine pagan and his intention with regard to religion can be described only as an endeavor to replace the Christian world-view with a pagan world-view. Moreover, he criticizes Christianity, while also politicizing it by appropriating it to his own end of worldly glory. In a fashion that Robert Black later uses to brutal affect, Hulliung lambasts his contemporary

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Prince; Questions 1. During the time just previous to the book, Machiavelli held civic posts within the government while the Medici was out of power. During a point, the Medici regained political power and Mr. Machiavelli’s job was taken. Machiavelli then wrote, The Prince, as what appears to be a plea to the Medici. 2. Three theme’s a. Human Nature – Machiavelli numerously brings up traits of the human nature explaining how humans are happy if they aren’t the victim. Also, humans will become

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli (1469–1527) was an Italian political and military theorist, civil servant, historian, playwright, and poet. Niccolo Machiavelli’s views of human nature strongly influenced his recommendations for governing. By nature Machiavelli’s cynical regard towards the nature of man were shaped by his observations of the Medici family and by his victimization at the hands of the powerful. Machiavelli held a decidedly negative view of human nature, one in which people existed to serve the

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    revolts, which will eventually happen. There has to be a balance between the two sides: love and fear. At the time that Machiavelli wrote this book, The Prince in the year of 1513, he dedicated it to a prince that he was completely obsessed with, Cesare Borgia, which fit his ideals since he does exactly what the book, The Prince tells him to. Today, the person that rules in the most Machiavellian way is a man that goes by Vladimir Putin, who happens to be the current Russian Prime Minister. While

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    2) As Machiavelli says, “Such dominions thus acquired are either accustomed to live under a prince, or to live in freedom,” (1). A prince ruling over a country doesn't allow them to be free and thus doesn't promote a common good. The Prince opposes Discourses on Livy on promoting a common good because the prince ruins the countries he steals. The Prince is in direct relation to Discourses of Livy's theory by contradiction. In The Prince, Machiavelli first says, “for men change their rulers

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1) “Fortune is a woman, and if you wish to keep her under it is necessary to beat and ill-use her,” (124). Nicolo Machiavelli says in The Prince that in order to control your luck in rising to be prince, you must control fortune. He believes that free will is the subject of fortune and that fortune and circumstance shape historic events, not the individual. Machiavelli has one view on free will and that is that fortune controls most of one's life. As he says, “...not to extinguish our free

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, who lived during the Renaissance, was a politician, a philosopher, and an author. His most highly regarded book, “The Prince” details the ways in which Machiavelli believes the world should be run. By using real world examples, as well as his own opinion, Machiavelli puts up points about everything that could harm a ruler, but also about what could lead to a leader becoming one of the greats. Machiavelli’s work was accepted widely around the world, and still to this day is read

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays