Cesare Zavattini

churches’ authority. Hence the demonization, and the attribution of duplicity to the term “Machiavellian.” Machiavelli wrote The Prince to serve as a handbook for rulers, and he claims explicitly throughout the work that he is not interested in talking about ideal republics or imaginary utopias, as many of his predecessors had done: “There is such a gap between how one lives and how one should live that he who neglects what is being done for what should be done will learn his destruction rather

Peace and War (Compare Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu) Throughout ancient history, there have been a number of ways that human beings have attempted or succeed in governing people. There has been an assortment of religions or philosophical ways that were said to be the best way to lead people, in order to gain power, or whatever their goal might be. Many of these ideas went against each other, saying the other one was wrong. One example of this was Niccole Machiavelli and his philosophical view, through

Machiavelli lived from the late 15th century into the early 16th century, best known for his political views in The Prince. Human beings (Man) requires and seeks order. Governments provide order to keep a certain flow in society. This order prevents chaos and allows Man to live day to day as they please under certain restriction. Government is composed of a leader or leaders. The leader is the person or government in charge, while the followers include the people under control (the masses/populace)

The excerpt from Machiavelli’s The Prince is a very curious and polarizing quotation because of the widely debated message that Machiavelli sends: that one must be able to fool people into believing that he/she has good qualities if the person does not have these qualities already. The argument that then follows this is the argument for transparency and truth, one that pertains to everyday situations today. The basis of Machiavelli’s statement is that he believes a leader who pretends to know what

Machiavelli’s The Prince talks about many issues of modern political philosophy, it was written to help rulers stay in power. His common themes are ruling through fear, being as powerful as a lion and as intelligent as a fox, and to maintain the state at all costs. One of the common discussions about his writings is what he means by “one must learn how to not be good.” For what reason should a ruler learn to not be good? He claims that being good and continuing to be good could only make a ruler

For Machiavelli himself, the "bigger objective" was typically not unimportant individual desire yet something like the steadiness or flourishing of a city-state or the unification of Italy under Italian standard. Machiavelli distinguishes the hobbies of the sovereign with the hobbies of the state (a presumption that can unquestionably be addressed!), accordingly directing Renaissance independence. Regardless, Machiavelli was an example of "force legislative issues." The pejorative descriptive word

There are many logical ideas that I was gathered from reading and I am able to conclude that I have a mixed opinion on this subject. Machiavelli's thoughts on being loved rather than feared are very different as he provides readers with examples on why being feared is more important to men than being loved. On the hand, Erasmus focuses on the important factor that being loved and loving plays in determining a good ruler, this is where Machiavelli and Erasmus' views differ. I believe that Machiavelli's

Outside people relations, Vlad embodied one of the most crucial principle Machiavelli stressed in “The Prince,” Principle 10 - How the Strength of All States Should be Measured. Machiavelli believes that for a prince to maintain his control over the state in times of war, he must be ready to fight for his people. Vlad went beyond that by succeeding his predecessors through weaponizing Wallachia for battle and personally leading the charge against neighboring states. His first hurdle was his confrontation

Sixteenth century Western Europe was ruled by kings chosen by divine right. Convincing a nation of people that their king deserves his power because an unseen creator made it so is not an easy task, therefore every action a king makes must be carefully constructed to balance all things that produce a beloved leader. A politician during this time named Niccolo Machiavelli wrote the world renowned book entitled The Prince which advised soon to be kings how to maintain control over their peoples without

“Criminal Man”: Cesare Lombroso Theory The subject that I found the most interest in was the Police Photography lectures. The lecture about Cesare Lombroso and his studying of criminals had my mind boggled. Once I heard that someone came up with a theory that people were born criminals made me interested to learn how could science possibly figure that out. His theory has now been discredited but, I choose the topic to learn about how he thought science could acknowledge who was born a criminal.